Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Tay, Tong-Earn

  • Google
  • 13
  • 8
  • 449

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (13/13 displayed)

  • 2022Effects of manufacturing on the structural performance of composites in vacuum assisted resin transfer molding5citations
  • 2022Numerical Investigations Into Nonlinear Vibro-Ultrasonics and Surface Vibration Comparison Method for Detection of Defects in a Composite Laminate3citations
  • 2021An Integrated Multiscale Simulation Routine to Predict Mechanical Performance from Manufacturing Effectscitations
  • 2019Experimental Investigations Into Nonlinear Vibro-Acoustics for Detection of Delaminations in a Composite Laminate9citations
  • 2019Effect of interlayer carbon fiber dispersion on the low-velocity impact performance of woven flax-carbon hybrid composites35citations
  • 2017Material orthotropy effects on progressive damage analysis of open-hole composite laminates under tension11citations
  • 2017Progressive damage simulation of open-hole composite laminates under compression based on different failure criteria31citations
  • 2017Analysis of composite stiffener under successive impact and bending test8citations
  • 2016Prototyping and testing of composite riser joints for deepwater applicationcitations
  • 2012A multi-axial fatigue model for fiber-reinforced composite laminates based on Puck’s criterion27citations
  • 2012Progressive Failure Analysis of Scaled Double-Notched Carbon/Epoxy Composite Laminates29citations
  • 2006Micromechanical Characterization Parameters for a New Failure Criterion for Composite Structures3citations
  • 2003Characterization and analysis of delamination fracture in composites: An overview of developments from 1990 to 2001288citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Tan, Vincent Bc
1 / 1 shared
Hamzah, M. Ridhwan Bin
1 / 1 shared
Rouhi, Mohammad S.
1 / 2 shared
Liu, Jl
1 / 1 shared
Chen, Yu
1 / 19 shared
Tan, Vincent B. C.
1 / 1 shared
Krause, Dieter
1 / 6 shared
Seemann, Ralf
1 / 4 shared
Chart of publication period
2022
2021
2019
2017
2016
2012
2006
2003

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Tan, Vincent Bc
  • Hamzah, M. Ridhwan Bin
  • Rouhi, Mohammad S.
  • Liu, Jl
  • Chen, Yu
  • Tan, Vincent B. C.
  • Krause, Dieter
  • Seemann, Ralf
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Micromechanical Characterization Parameters for a New Failure Criterion for Composite Structures

  • Tay, Tong-Earn
Abstract

<jats:p>Strain Invariant Failure Theory (SIFT) is a newly-developed failure criterion for composite structures [8, 9]. SIFT comprises two main features, namely micromechanical finite element modification and critical strain invariant parameters. Micromechanical finite element modification is performed to incorporate residual strains between fibers and matrix into homogenized finite element lamina solution. The presence of residual strains takes into account the mechanical and thermal (environmental) effects. Critical strain invariant parameters can be obtained from simple tensile test by carefully observing the occurrence of damage initiation in composite constituent. Strain tensors extracted from experiment are substituted into strain invariant parameters of i J1 (first invariant of strain; i = f, m—fiber, matrix) and i vm ε (equivalent strain or von Mises strain; subscript vm stands for von Mises). As noted in [8, 9], three critical strain invariants were found to be the onset of composite failure for carbon-fiber/epoxy system; they are m J1−cr , f vm−cr ε and m vm−cr ε . Micromechanical characterization parameters aim to provide general insight on the critical state of strains in which damage initiation locus may be determined by using SIFT critical parameters. Micromechanical model was subjected to six different loading conditions (three normal deformations and three shear deformations) and strain tensors (ε1, ε2, ε3, ε12, ε13, ε23) were extracted from finite element analysis. Micromechanical characterization parameters were obtained by normalizing the strain invariants of micromechanics analysis with respect to critical strain invariant. Important issues such as effect of fiber volume fraction and fiber packing arrangement are briefly discussed.</jats:p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • Carbon
  • theory
  • experiment
  • composite
  • finite element analysis
  • normalizing