Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Busari, M. N. M.

  • Google
  • 1
  • 5
  • 17

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2012Evaluation of Direct Rapid Prototyping Pattern for Investment Casting17citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Omar, M. F. M.
1 / 2 shared
Hehsan, H.
1 / 2 shared
Ibrahim, M.
1 / 9 shared
Hafsa, M. N.
1 / 4 shared
Sharif, S.
1 / 3 shared
Chart of publication period
2012

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Omar, M. F. M.
  • Hehsan, H.
  • Ibrahim, M.
  • Hafsa, M. N.
  • Sharif, S.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Evaluation of Direct Rapid Prototyping Pattern for Investment Casting

  • Omar, M. F. M.
  • Busari, M. N. M.
  • Hehsan, H.
  • Ibrahim, M.
  • Hafsa, M. N.
  • Sharif, S.
Abstract

<jats:p>The ability of rapid prototyping (RP) technology to fabricate direct part of any complex shape as a sacrificial pattern in shorter lead time has benefited the foundry industries significantly. The quality of investment casting (IC) parts is directly related to the master pattern fabricated from RP process. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the quality characteristics of various RP patterns that were fabricated by various RP processes which include 3D Printer (3DP), Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) and Multijet Modeling (MJM). Evaluation of the RP patterns was carried out on dimensional accuracy, surface roughness and pattern shrinkage. Different internal pattern designs for the RP parts were developed using Insight software for FDM process and Solidworks 2011 for other RP systems. In addition to the quality assessments, the effect of the internal pattern designs on the burn out behaviour of the RP patterns was also evaluated. Experimental results showed that FDM and MJM produced patterns with better accuracy, surface roughness and part shrinkage when compared to 3DP. It was evident that the internal pattern structure improved the accuracy of the patterns produced from all RP processes. Results showed that FDM and MJM processes were superior in terms of mold cleanliness when no residual ash was observed during the burn out stage. Significant oxidation of ceramic powder was observed on the molds of the 3DP patterns which need to be removed manually from the molds.</jats:p>

Topics
  • Deposition
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • ceramic
  • ion chromatography
  • investment casting