Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Vignesh, V.

  • Google
  • 8
  • 25
  • 167

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (8/8 displayed)

  • 2022Investigation into Mechanical, Thermal and Water Absorption Behaviors of Cocos nucifera Shell Filler Reinforced Vinyl Ester Polymeric Compositescitations
  • 2021Evaluation of mechanical, thermal and water absorption behaviors of Polyalthia longifolia seed reinforced vinyl ester composites60citations
  • 2021Applicability of cellulosic-based Polyalthia longigolia seed filler reinforced vinyl ester biocomposites on tribological performancecitations
  • 2021Investigation into Mechanical, Thermal and Water Absorption Behaviors of Cocos nucifera Shell Filler Reinforced Vinyl Ester Polymeric Composites14citations
  • 2021Cellulosic fiber based hybrid composites: A comparative investigation into their structurally influencing mechanical propertiescitations
  • 2020Evaluation of mechanical, thermal and water absorption behaviors of Polyalthia longifolia seed reinforced vinyl ester composites60citations
  • 2020Applicability of cellulosic-based Polyalthia longigolia seed filler reinforced vinyl ester biocomposites on tribological performance31citations
  • 2016Finite Element Modelling of Orthogonal Cryogenic Machining Process2citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Ismail, Sikiru O.
1 / 22 shared
Mohammad, Faruq
2 / 19 shared
Karthick, T.
2 / 3 shared
Mothilal, S.
2 / 2 shared
Rajini, N.
7 / 31 shared
Siengchin, Suchart
2 / 21 shared
Raja Mohamed Rabi, B.
1 / 1 shared
David Gnanaraj, J.
1 / 1 shared
Ravichandran, M.
4 / 25 shared
Stalin, B.
4 / 10 shared
Nagaprasad, N.
4 / 11 shared
Ismail, S. O.
3 / 40 shared
Mohammad, F.
2 / 21 shared
Rabi, B. Raja Mohamed
1 / 1 shared
Gnanaraj, J. David
1 / 1 shared
Karthikeyan, M. K. V.
1 / 1 shared
Mohammade, F.
1 / 1 shared
Al-Lohedan, H. A.
1 / 11 shared
Ayrilmis, N.
1 / 5 shared
Rabi, B. R. M.
1 / 1 shared
Balaji, A. N.
1 / 3 shared
Sekar, K. S. Vijay
1 / 7 shared
Kumar, Murugasan Pradeep
1 / 1 shared
Sekar, Vijay
1 / 11 shared
Sriram, S.
1 / 4 shared
Chart of publication period
2022
2021
2020
2016

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Ismail, Sikiru O.
  • Mohammad, Faruq
  • Karthick, T.
  • Mothilal, S.
  • Rajini, N.
  • Siengchin, Suchart
  • Raja Mohamed Rabi, B.
  • David Gnanaraj, J.
  • Ravichandran, M.
  • Stalin, B.
  • Nagaprasad, N.
  • Ismail, S. O.
  • Mohammad, F.
  • Rabi, B. Raja Mohamed
  • Gnanaraj, J. David
  • Karthikeyan, M. K. V.
  • Mohammade, F.
  • Al-Lohedan, H. A.
  • Ayrilmis, N.
  • Rabi, B. R. M.
  • Balaji, A. N.
  • Sekar, K. S. Vijay
  • Kumar, Murugasan Pradeep
  • Sekar, Vijay
  • Sriram, S.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Finite Element Modelling of Orthogonal Cryogenic Machining Process

  • Sekar, K. S. Vijay
  • Kumar, Murugasan Pradeep
  • Sekar, Vijay
  • Sriram, S.
  • Vignesh, V.
Abstract

<jats:p>The present work aims in creating the Finite Element Models for the conventional and the Cryogenic Orthogonal machining process. Finite Element Modelling (FEM) of the orthogonal machining operation was performed using DEFORM – 2D which is based on a modified Lagrangian formulation. Finite Element models were developed for various experimental conditions for both conventional and cryogenic orthogonal machining process. The response variables obtained from the models are cutting force, thrust force, temperature, shear stress, strain and strain rate. AISI 1045 steel is used as work material and for tool, tungsten carbide is used under various experimental conditions with the cutting speeds at 100 m/min, 150 m/min, 200 m/min and feeds at 0.07 mm/rev, 0.1 mm/rev, 0.14 mm/rev. A maximum temperature difference of 20.12% is obtained when conventional and cryogenic models were compared at a feed rate of 0.07 mm/rev and cutting speed of 150 m/min. cutting force and thrust force were higher for cryogenic model compared with that of the conventional model. Stress and Strain were distributed as expected to occur in the experiment.</jats:p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • experiment
  • carbide
  • steel
  • tungsten