Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Ramos, António

  • Google
  • 4
  • 12
  • 43

University of Aveiro

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (4/4 displayed)

  • 2023The Tolerancing Obtained with Binder Jetting Additive Manufacturing Process in 17-4PH Steel - Case Studycitations
  • 2022Comparative study of titanium alloys machinability used for medical applications7citations
  • 2021Comparison of CAD-CAM and traditional chairside processing of 4-unit interim prostheses with and without cantilevers14citations
  • 2018Performance assessment of flat slabs strengthened with a bonded reinforced-concrete overlay22citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Relvas, Carlos
1 / 1 shared
Lima, Eleandro
1 / 1 shared
Esteves, José L.
1 / 1 shared
Pinto, António Correia
1 / 1 shared
Coelho, Carolina
1 / 1 shared
Calamote, Catarina
1 / 2 shared
Escuin, Tomás
1 / 1 shared
Matias De Souza, Júlio César
1 / 75 shared
Lúcio, Válter
1 / 5 shared
Lapi, Massimo
1 / 3 shared
Orlando, Maurizio
1 / 3 shared
Fernandes, Hugo
1 / 5 shared
Chart of publication period
2023
2022
2021
2018

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Relvas, Carlos
  • Lima, Eleandro
  • Esteves, José L.
  • Pinto, António Correia
  • Coelho, Carolina
  • Calamote, Catarina
  • Escuin, Tomás
  • Matias De Souza, Júlio César
  • Lúcio, Válter
  • Lapi, Massimo
  • Orlando, Maurizio
  • Fernandes, Hugo
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

The Tolerancing Obtained with Binder Jetting Additive Manufacturing Process in 17-4PH Steel - Case Study

  • Ramos, António
  • Relvas, Carlos
  • Lima, Eleandro
Abstract

<jats:p>Digital manufacturing is one of the pillars of Industry 4.0, additive manufacturing is certainly evolving very quickly, with more and more technologies being developed and materials being applied to this production area. However, with this growth and the capacity associated with this type of processes, it is extremely important to understand these processes, so that they can respond quantitatively and qualitatively to market needs. The present work intended to contribute to the improvement of the metal binder jetting process by simulating the manufacturing process of a proposed part, using the Simufact™ software and Desktop Metal software. After validating the parts with manufacturing with Binder jetting additive process. Subsequently, the metrological inspection and analysis of the respective results were carried out. Simulations were carried out for different values of powder size and density of the green part to assess their impact on the quality of the final part. The parts were produced in 17 – 4PH steel using a Shop System Desktop Metal machine. Were produced 5 parts with the following parameters, part (A) model with compensation obtained by Desktop software, part (B) model compensated by the <jats:italic>Simufact</jats:italic> additive software with 20% scale, part (C) model with scale 1: 1.2, part (D) model obtained by the <jats:italic>Simufact additive</jats:italic> software and part (E) model without scale. The measurements for the dimensional analysis were made with a digital caliper, while for the geometric analysis, measurements were made on a CMM machine.The simulations revealed smaller errors for larger granule sizes and also for larger green part densities. The inspection of the produced part, on the other side, exposed greater dimensional inaccuracy in X and less in Z direction. It also showed that, for the same element of the part, there is still a relationship between the ratio of the measured dimensions and the ratio of the deviations obtained. The results also showed that parts simulated by two software’s (A and D) are the ones with the best final quality, they presented smaller dimensional and geometric deviations in relation to the proposed model. The highest tolerance grades of these parts were in ISO standard IT15 and IT14 for part D and part A respectively.</jats:p>

Topics
  • density
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • simulation
  • laser emission spectroscopy
  • steel
  • binder jetting