People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Soyarslan, Celal
University of Twente
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (22/22 displayed)
- 2024Additive manufacturing of NiTi architected metamaterialscitations
- 2023Functional performance of NiTi shape memory architected structures produced by laser powder bed fusion (LPBF)
- 2023Asymptotic homogenization in the determination of effective intrinsic magnetic properties of compositescitations
- 2022Asymptotic Homogenization in the Determination of Effective Intrinsic Magnetic Properties of Composites
- 2022Periodic Homogenization in Crystal Plasticity
- 20183D stochastic bicontinuous microstructures: generation, topology and elasticitycitations
- 2018A class of rate-independent lower-order gradient plasticity theoriescitations
- 2017Size affected dislocation activity in crystals : advanced surface and grain boundary conditions
- 2017Implementation and application of a gradient enhanced crystal plasticity modelcitations
- 2017Effect of surface elasticity on the elastic response of nanoporous gold
- 2016Structure-property relationships in nanoporous metallic glassescitations
- 2015Modeling of fracture in small punch tests for small- and large-scale yielding conditions at various temperatures
- 2015Elastic and plastic poisson’s ratios of nanoporous gold
- 2015Materials based design of structures: computational modeling of the mechanical behavior of gold-polymer nanocomposites
- 2014Finite element methodcitations
- 2014Formability assessment of advanced high strength steel sheets using (an)isotropic Lemaitre’s damage model
- 2014Inherent and induced anisotropic finite visco-plasticity with applications to the forming of DC06 sheetscitations
- 2014On the distortion of yield surface under complex loading paths in sheet metal forming
- 2013Anwendung der expliziten FEM in der Umformtechnik
- 2013Inverse identification of CDM model parameters for DP1000 steel sheets using a hybrid experimental-numerical methodology spanning various stress triaxiality ratioscitations
- 2011Analysis of formability of advanced high strength steel sheets with phenomenologically based failure criteria with separate treatment of instability, shear and normal fracture
- 2008Application of continuum damage mechanics in discontinuous crack formationcitations
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
document
Periodic Homogenization in Crystal Plasticity
Abstract
<p>In this paper, macroscopic behavior obtained from crystal plasticity finite element simulations of irregularly shaped 3D and 2D volume elements (VEs) are compared. These morphologically periodic VEs are generated using the open-source software library Voro++. Periodic boundary conditions are utilized to homogenize the material response employing a prescribed macroscopic deformation gradient tensor. To accelerate the assignment of periodic boundary conditions, a conformal mesh is employed by which periodic couples of faces on the hull of the volume element have identical mesh patterns. In the simulations, plane strain conditions are assumed, which means that the average thickness strain in 3D VEs is set to zero. However, grains are allowed to strain in the thickness direction. In the case of 2D VEs, plane strain elements are used. The principal goal of this comparison is to evaluate the accuracy of 2D VEs simulations. In the current study, two kinds of 2D VEs are generated: 1) Slicing 3D VEs normal to the thickness direction, 2) Separately generating 2D VEs. The first method corresponds to sectioning 3D microstructures using EBSD. This approach is generally used as an assumed more accurate alternative to 2D VEs. Based on the results, there is a large gap between the flow curves of 2D and 3D VEs. Additionally, 2D sectioning of 3D VEs does not necessarily end up in higher precision in material behavior predictions.</p>