Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Walia, Arminder Singh

  • Google
  • 2
  • 6
  • 67

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2023Data driven surrogate model-based optimization of the process parameters in electric discharge machining of D2 steel using Cu-SiC composite tool for the machined surface roughness and the tool wear1citations
  • 2021Revealing the WEDM process parameters for the machining of pure and heat-treated titanium (Ti-6Al-4V) alloy66citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Somani, Nalin
2 / 4 shared
Pruncu, Catalin I.
1 / 28 shared
Singh, Sunpreet
1 / 9 shared
Prakash, Chander
1 / 12 shared
Gupta, Nitin Kumar
1 / 2 shared
Singh, Ranjit
1 / 3 shared
Chart of publication period
2023
2021

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Somani, Nalin
  • Pruncu, Catalin I.
  • Singh, Sunpreet
  • Prakash, Chander
  • Gupta, Nitin Kumar
  • Singh, Ranjit
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Data driven surrogate model-based optimization of the process parameters in electric discharge machining of D2 steel using Cu-SiC composite tool for the machined surface roughness and the tool wear

  • Somani, Nalin
  • Walia, Arminder Singh
Abstract

<jats:p>Electrical discharge machining (EDM) is mainly utilized for the die manufacturing and also used to machine the hard materials. Pure Copper, Copper based alloys, brass, graphite, steel are the conventional electrode materials for EDM process. While machining with the conventional electrode materials, tool wear becomes the main bottleneck which led to increased machining cost. In the present work, the composite tool tip comprises 80% Copper and 20% silicon carbide was used for the machining of hardened D2 steel. The powder metallurgy route was used to fabricate the composite tool tip. Electrode wear rate and surface roughness were assessed with respect to the different process parameters like input current, gap voltage, pulse on time, pulse off time and dielectric flushing pressure. During the analysis it was found that Input current (I p ), Pulse on time (T on ) and Pulse off time (T off ) were the significant parameters which were affecting the tool wear rate (TWR) while the I p , T on and flushing pressure affected more the surface roughness (SR). SEM micrograph reveals that increase in I p leads to increase in the wear rate of the tool. The data obtained from experiments were used to develop machine learning based surrogate models. Three machine learning (ML) models are random forest, polynomial regression and gradient boosted tree. The predictive capability of ML based surrogate models was assessed by contrasting the R 2 and mean square error (MSE) of prediction of responses. The best surrogate model was used to develop a complex objective function for use in firefly algorithm-based optimization of input machining parameters for minimization of the output responses.</jats:p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • scanning electron microscopy
  • experiment
  • carbide
  • steel
  • composite
  • copper
  • Silicon
  • random
  • machine learning
  • brass