Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Bond, Ia

  • Google
  • 1
  • 7
  • 41

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2020Revisiting MOA 2013-BLG-220L: a solar-type star with a cold super-Jupiter companion41citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Vandorou, A.
1 / 1 shared
Bennett, Dp
1 / 1 shared
Bhattacharya, A.
1 / 15 shared
Koshimoto, N.
1 / 1 shared
Marquette, J-B
1 / 1 shared
Blackman, J. W.
1 / 1 shared
Alard, C.
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2020

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Vandorou, A.
  • Bennett, Dp
  • Bhattacharya, A.
  • Koshimoto, N.
  • Marquette, J-B
  • Blackman, J. W.
  • Alard, C.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Revisiting MOA 2013-BLG-220L: a solar-type star with a cold super-Jupiter companion

  • Vandorou, A.
  • Bennett, Dp
  • Bhattacharya, A.
  • Koshimoto, N.
  • Marquette, J-B
  • Bond, Ia
  • Blackman, J. W.
  • Alard, C.
Abstract

We present the analysis of high-resolution images of MOA-2013-BLG-220, taken with the Keck adaptive optics system six years after the initial observation, identifying the lens as a solar-type star hosting a super-Jupiter-mass planet. The masses of planets and host stars discovered by microlensing are often not determined from light-curve data, while the star?planet mass ratio and projected separation in units of Einstein ring radius are well measured. High-resolution follow-up observations after the lensing event is complete can resolve the source and lens. This allows direct measurements of flux, and the amplitude and direction of proper motion, giving strong constraints on the system parameters. Due to the high relative proper motion, <i>&#956;</i><sub>rel,Geo</sub> = 12.62 ? 0.11 mas yr<sup>-1</sup>, the source and lens were resolved in 2019, with a separation of 77.1 ? 0.5 mas. Thus, we constrain the lens flux to K<sub>Keck,lens</sub> = 17.92 ? 0.02. By combining constraints from the model and Keck flux, we find the lens mass to be <i>M<sub>L</sub></i> = 0.88 ? 0.05 <i>M</i><sub>&#8857;</sub>at <i>D<sub>L</sub></i> = 6.72 ? 0.59 kpc. With a mass ratio of <i>q</i> = (3.00 ? 0.03) x 10<sup>-3</sup> the planet?s mass is determined to be <i>M</i><sub>P</sub> = 2.74 ? 0.17 <i>M</i><sub>J</sub> at a separation of <i>r</i><sub>&#8869;</sub> = 3.03 ? 0.27 au. The lens mass is much higher than the prediction made by Bayesian analysis that assumes all stars have an equal probability to host a planet of the measured mass ratio, and suggests that planets with mass ratios of a few times 10<sup>-3</sup> are more common orbiting massive stars. This demonstrates the importance of high-resolution follow-up observations for testing theories like these.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy