Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Musa, Nur Hidayah

  • Google
  • 1
  • 5
  • 1

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2023High densification level and hardness values of additively manufactured 316L stainless steel fabricated by fused filament fabrication1citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Yusuf, Shahir Mohd
1 / 1 shared
Mazlan, Nurainaa
1 / 2 shared
Gao, Nong
1 / 38 shared
Mazlan, Saiful Amri
1 / 4 shared
Nordin, Nur Azmah
1 / 3 shared
Chart of publication period
2023

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Yusuf, Shahir Mohd
  • Mazlan, Nurainaa
  • Gao, Nong
  • Mazlan, Saiful Amri
  • Nordin, Nur Azmah
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

High densification level and hardness values of additively manufactured 316L stainless steel fabricated by fused filament fabrication

  • Musa, Nur Hidayah
  • Yusuf, Shahir Mohd
  • Mazlan, Nurainaa
  • Gao, Nong
  • Mazlan, Saiful Amri
  • Nordin, Nur Azmah
Abstract

Laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF) has emerged as the most widely used additive manufacturing (AM) process, also known as 3D printing, to fabricate 316L stainless steel (316L SS) components for various applications. However, the initial setup, operation, and maintenance costs are too expensive due to the complex machinery, high energy-consuming laser beam, and proprietary software required. Therefore, in this paper, fused fiament fabrication (FFF) is proposed as a low-cost AM approach to fabricate 316L SS specimens via a 3-step printing-debinding-and sintering process. The specimens are initially printed on a desktop FFF AM 3D printer by varying nozzle temperatures from 195 – 220°C, followed by debinding up to 427°C for 4 hours, and finally sintering at 1260°C for 4 hours. The results show that nozzle temperature 200°C yielded the highest densification level of 97.6% and highest average hardness value of 292 HV, indicating that 3D printing parameters, particularly nozzle temperature plays an important role in influencing the properties of the sintered specimens. Overall, the results from this study prove that FFF is a viable and cost-effective AM process that has the potential to produce 316L SS parts that meet industrial requirements.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • stainless steel
  • hardness
  • selective laser melting
  • sintering
  • densification
  • field-flow fractionation