Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Wilson, John W.

  • Google
  • 11
  • 25
  • 74

University of Manchester

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (11/11 displayed)

  • 2022Indirect yoke-based B-H hysteresis measurement method determining the magnetic properties of macroscopic ferromagnetic samples part I: Room temperature2citations
  • 2019Magnetic characterisation of grain size and precipitate distribution by major and minor BH loop measurements19citations
  • 2017Detection of creep degradation during pressure vessel testing using electromagnetic sensor technology5citations
  • 2017Optimized setup and protocol for magnetic domain imaging with in Situ hysteresis measurement4citations
  • 2016Defect representation using the electromagnetic tensor formulation for eddy current NDTcitations
  • 2016Defect representation using the electromagnetic tensor formulation for eddy current NDTcitations
  • 2015Electromagnetic evaluation of the microstructure of grade 91 tubes/pipes15citations
  • 2014Differential permeability behaviour of P9 and T22 power station Steels13citations
  • 2014Incremental permeability and magnetic Barkhausen noise for the assessment of microstructural changes in Grade 91 power station tubescitations
  • 2013Magnetic sensing for microstructural assessment of power station steels: Differential permeability and magnetic hysteresis2citations
  • 2010Sensor fusion for electromagnetic stress measurement and material characterisation14citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Ebner, R.
1 / 6 shared
Mevec, D. G.
1 / 1 shared
Prevedel, P.
1 / 2 shared
Riedler, J. M.
1 / 1 shared
Raninger, P.
1 / 2 shared
Jászfi, V.
1 / 2 shared
Peyton, Antony J.
7 / 19 shared
Davis, Claire L.
3 / 7 shared
Liu, Jun
5 / 25 shared
Shibli, Ahmed
1 / 3 shared
Davis, Claire
3 / 47 shared
Allen, David J.
1 / 1 shared
Yin, Wuliang
4 / 9 shared
Karimian, Noushin
3 / 8 shared
Peyton, Anthony J.
2 / 11 shared
Lu, Mingyang
1 / 1 shared
Strangwood, Martin
1 / 19 shared
Parker, Jonathan
1 / 3 shared
Karimian, N.
2 / 8 shared
Kahlon, Navdeep Singh
1 / 1 shared
Liu, J.
1 / 87 shared
Davis, C. L.
1 / 15 shared
Morozov, Maxim
1 / 9 shared
Qubaa, Abd
1 / 1 shared
Tian, Gui
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2022
2019
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2010

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Ebner, R.
  • Mevec, D. G.
  • Prevedel, P.
  • Riedler, J. M.
  • Raninger, P.
  • Jászfi, V.
  • Peyton, Antony J.
  • Davis, Claire L.
  • Liu, Jun
  • Shibli, Ahmed
  • Davis, Claire
  • Allen, David J.
  • Yin, Wuliang
  • Karimian, Noushin
  • Peyton, Anthony J.
  • Lu, Mingyang
  • Strangwood, Martin
  • Parker, Jonathan
  • Karimian, N.
  • Kahlon, Navdeep Singh
  • Liu, J.
  • Davis, C. L.
  • Morozov, Maxim
  • Qubaa, Abd
  • Tian, Gui
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Optimized setup and protocol for magnetic domain imaging with in Situ hysteresis measurement

  • Peyton, Antony J.
  • Wilson, John W.
  • Liu, Jun
  • Davis, Claire
Abstract

This paper elaborates the sample preparation protocols required to obtain optimal domain patterns using the Bitter method, focusing on the extra steps compared to standard metallographic sample preparation procedures. The paper proposes a novel bespoke rig for dynamic domain imaging with in situ BH (magnetic hysteresis) measurements and elaborates the protocols for the sensor preparation and the use of the rig to ensure accurate BH measurement. The protocols for static and ordinary dynamic domain imaging (without in situ BH measurements) are also presented. The reported method takes advantage of the convenience and high sensitivity of the traditional Bitter method and enables in situ BH measurement without interrupting or interfering with the domain wall movement processes. This facilitates establishing a direct and quantitative link between the domain wall movement processes–microstructural feature interactions in ferritic steels with their BH loops. This method is anticipated to become a useful tool for the fundamental study of microstructure–magnetic property relationships in steels and to help interpret the electromagnetic sensor signals for non-destructive evaluation of steel microstructures.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • microstructure
  • steel
  • magnetic property