Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Mensinga, Anneloes

  • Google
  • 2
  • 19
  • 55

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2021The Complexity of Joint Regeneration: How an Advanced Implant could Fail by Its In Vivo Proven Bone Component9citations
  • 2020A composite hydrogel-3D printed thermoplast osteochondral anchor as an example for a zonal approach to cartilage repair: in vivo performance in a long-term equine model46citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Abinzano, Florencia
1 / 1 shared
Levato, Riccardo
2 / 13 shared
Smit, Ineke
1 / 1 shared
Khan, Ilyas
1 / 1 shared
Brommer, Harold
2 / 5 shared
Plomp, Saskia
1 / 3 shared
Ruijter, Mylène De
1 / 4 shared
Malda, Jos
2 / 39 shared
Castilho, Miguel Dias
1 / 1 shared
Diloksumpan, Paweena
1 / 5 shared
Weeren, P. René Van
2 / 5 shared
Schäfer, Simone
1 / 1 shared
Tessmar, Joerg
1 / 3 shared
Blunk, Torsten
1 / 3 shared
Pouran, Behdad
1 / 3 shared
Rijen, Mattie H. P. Van
1 / 1 shared
Groll, Juergen
1 / 1 shared
Schmidt, Stefanie
1 / 3 shared
Mancini, Irina A. D.
1 / 3 shared
Chart of publication period
2021
2020

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Abinzano, Florencia
  • Levato, Riccardo
  • Smit, Ineke
  • Khan, Ilyas
  • Brommer, Harold
  • Plomp, Saskia
  • Ruijter, Mylène De
  • Malda, Jos
  • Castilho, Miguel Dias
  • Diloksumpan, Paweena
  • Weeren, P. René Van
  • Schäfer, Simone
  • Tessmar, Joerg
  • Blunk, Torsten
  • Pouran, Behdad
  • Rijen, Mattie H. P. Van
  • Groll, Juergen
  • Schmidt, Stefanie
  • Mancini, Irina A. D.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

The Complexity of Joint Regeneration: How an Advanced Implant could Fail by Its In Vivo Proven Bone Component

  • Abinzano, Florencia
  • Levato, Riccardo
  • Smit, Ineke
  • Mensinga, Anneloes
  • Khan, Ilyas
  • Brommer, Harold
  • Plomp, Saskia
  • Ruijter, Mylène De
  • Malda, Jos
  • Castilho, Miguel Dias
  • Diloksumpan, Paweena
  • Weeren, P. René Van
Abstract

Articular cartilage damage is a major challenge in healthcare due to the lack of long-term repair options. There are several promising regenerative implant-based approaches for the treatment, but the fixation of the implant remains a significant challenge. This study evaluated the potential for repair of an osteochondral implant produced through a novel combined bioprinting-based chondral-bone integration, with and without cells, in an equine model. Implants consisted of a melt electrowritten polycaprolactone (PCL) framework for the chondral compartment, which was firmly integrated with a bone anchor. The bone anchor was produced by extrusion-based printing of a low-temperature setting bioceramic material that had been proven to be effective for osteo-regeneration in an orthotopic, non-load bearing and non-articular site in the same species in an earlier in vivo study. Articular cartilage-derived progenitor cells were seeded into the PCL framework and cultured for 28 days in vitro in the presence of bone morphogenetic protein-9 (BMP-9), resulting in the formation of abundant extracellular matrix rich in glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) and type II collagen. The constructs were implanted in the stifle joints of Shetland ponies with cell-free scaffolds as controls. Clinical signs were monitored, and progression of healing was observed non-invasively through radiographic examinations and quantitative gait analysis. Biochemical and histological analyses 6 months after implantation revealed minimal deposition of GAGs and type II collagen in the chondral compartment of the defect site for both types of implants. Quantitative micro-computed tomography showed collapse of the bone anchor with low volume of mineralized neo-bone formation in both groups. Histology confirmed that the PCL framework within the chondral compartment was still present. It was concluded that the collapse of the osteal anchor, resulting in loss of the mechanical support of the chondral compartment, strongly affected overall outcome, precluding evaluation of the influence of BMP-9 stimulated cells on in vivo cartilage regeneration.

Topics
  • Deposition
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • melt
  • extrusion
  • tomography
  • defect