Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Negi, Ashutosh

  • Google
  • 1
  • 4
  • 1

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2024Exploring the Potential of Recycled Polypropylene-Waste Jute Fiber Composites for Sound Insulation: An Experimental and Theoretical Analysis1citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Mago, Jonty
1 / 2 shared
Jaish, Sunali
1 / 1 shared
Fatim, S.
1 / 1 shared
Bolton, J. Stuart
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2024

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Mago, Jonty
  • Jaish, Sunali
  • Fatim, S.
  • Bolton, J. Stuart
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Exploring the Potential of Recycled Polypropylene-Waste Jute Fiber Composites for Sound Insulation: An Experimental and Theoretical Analysis

  • Mago, Jonty
  • Negi, Ashutosh
  • Jaish, Sunali
  • Fatim, S.
  • Bolton, J. Stuart
Abstract

<jats:p>This study explores the potential of panels made from Recycled Polypropylene (RPP) and Waste Jute Fiber (WJF) for sound insulation applications. Two types of panels were fabricated by the compression molding process: Neat RPP and a composite of RPP reinforced with a WJF interlayer (RPP/WJF/RPP).The physical properties, namely density and mechanical properties, such as tensile strength and modulus, were examined for both panels. The vibration properties of the panels were evaluated through a modal analysis conducted according to ASTM E756-05 guidelines, while sound insulation wasassessed by measuring normal incidence sound transmission loss (STL) using a four-microphone impedance-tube setup following ASTM E2611-19 standards. The RPP/WJF/RPP composite, with a density of 913 kg/m³, is 2.47% higher than that of Neat RPP, which is 891 kg/m³, and exhibited anincreased tensile strength of 12.01 MPa, compared to 10.03 MPa for Neat RPP. In the second vibration mode, the composite's damping ratio of 3.62% outperformed Neat RPP's 2.48%. Furthermore, the composite's measured average STL was 38.6 dB, exceeding the Neat RPP's average of 37.7 dB. Thisenhancement in STL is likely attributed to the composite's higher surface density (5.21 kg/m²) relative to Neat RPP (4.72 kg/m²), contributing to its improved sound insulation properties. The theoretical average STL values, predicted using the Mass</jats:p>

Topics
  • density
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • strength
  • composite
  • tensile strength
  • compression molding