Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Kumar, Dr. Krishna

  • Google
  • 4
  • 13
  • 104

Lund University

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (4/4 displayed)

  • 2023Evaluating 28-Days Performance of Rice Husk Ash Green Concrete under Compression Gleaned from Neural Networks3citations
  • 2023Performance prognosis of FRCM-to-concrete bond strength using ANFIS-based fuzzy algorithm36citations
  • 2022Enhancing Sustainability of Corroded RC Structures26citations
  • 2022Prediction of FRCM–Concrete Bond Strength with Machine Learning Approach39citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Rai, Hardeep Singh
2 / 3 shared
Kumar, Aman
4 / 8 shared
Onyelowe, Kennedy C.
1 / 3 shared
Singh, Sharanjit
1 / 4 shared
Arora, Harish Chandra
4 / 8 shared
Kapoor, Nishant Raj
2 / 5 shared
Garg, Harish
1 / 1 shared
Singh, Rohan
1 / 2 shared
Bahrami, Alireza
1 / 41 shared
Majumdar, Arnab
1 / 3 shared
Mohammed, Mazin Abed
1 / 2 shared
Khamaksorn, Achara
1 / 1 shared
Thinnukool, Orawit
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2023
2022

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Rai, Hardeep Singh
  • Kumar, Aman
  • Onyelowe, Kennedy C.
  • Singh, Sharanjit
  • Arora, Harish Chandra
  • Kapoor, Nishant Raj
  • Garg, Harish
  • Singh, Rohan
  • Bahrami, Alireza
  • Majumdar, Arnab
  • Mohammed, Mazin Abed
  • Khamaksorn, Achara
  • Thinnukool, Orawit
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Prediction of FRCM–Concrete Bond Strength with Machine Learning Approach

  • Majumdar, Arnab
  • Kumar, Aman
  • Arora, Harish Chandra
  • Mohammed, Mazin Abed
  • Khamaksorn, Achara
  • Kumar, Dr. Krishna
  • Thinnukool, Orawit
Abstract

<p>Fibre-reinforced cement mortar (FRCM) has been widely utilised for the repair and restora-tion of building structures. The bond strength between FRCM and concrete typically takes precedence over the mechanical parameters. However, the bond behaviour of the FRCM–concrete interface is complex. Due to several failure modes, the prediction of bond strength is difficult to forecast. In this paper, effective machine learning models were employed in order to accurately predict the FRCM–concrete bond strength. This article employed a database of 382 test results available in the literature on single-lap and double-lap shear experiments on FRCM–concrete interfacial bonding. The compressive strength of concrete, width of concrete block, FRCM elastic modulus, thickness of textile layer, textile width, textile bond length, and bond strength of FRCM–concrete interface have been taken into consideration with popular machine learning models. The paper estimates the predictive accuracy of different machine learning models for estimating the FRCM–concrete bond strength and found that the GPR model has the highest accuracy with an R-value of 0.9336 for interfacial bond strength prediction. This study can be utilising in the estimation of bond strength to minimise the experimentation cost in minimum time.</p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • experiment
  • strength
  • cement
  • interfacial
  • machine learning