Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Donlon, C.

  • Google
  • 1
  • 15
  • 32

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2020Benefits and lessons learned from the sentinel-3 tandem phase32citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Mittaz, J.
1 / 1 shared
Woolliams, E.
1 / 1 shared
Lamquin, N.
1 / 1 shared
Hunt, S. E.
1 / 1 shared
Banks, C.
1 / 10 shared
Hammond, M.
1 / 2 shared
Borde, F.
1 / 1 shared
Clerc, S.
1 / 1 shared
Smith, D.
1 / 13 shared
Mcmillan, Malcolm
1 / 1 shared
Moreau, T.
1 / 3 shared
Picard, B.
1 / 2 shared
Raynal, M.
1 / 1 shared
Rieu, P.
1 / 1 shared
Guérou, A.
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2020

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Mittaz, J.
  • Woolliams, E.
  • Lamquin, N.
  • Hunt, S. E.
  • Banks, C.
  • Hammond, M.
  • Borde, F.
  • Clerc, S.
  • Smith, D.
  • Mcmillan, Malcolm
  • Moreau, T.
  • Picard, B.
  • Raynal, M.
  • Rieu, P.
  • Guérou, A.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Benefits and lessons learned from the sentinel-3 tandem phase

  • Mittaz, J.
  • Woolliams, E.
  • Lamquin, N.
  • Hunt, S. E.
  • Banks, C.
  • Hammond, M.
  • Donlon, C.
  • Borde, F.
  • Clerc, S.
  • Smith, D.
  • Mcmillan, Malcolm
  • Moreau, T.
  • Picard, B.
  • Raynal, M.
  • Rieu, P.
  • Guérou, A.
Abstract

During its commissioning phase, the Copernicus Sentinel-3B satellite has been placed in a tandem formation with Sentinel-3A for a period of 6 months. This configuration allowed a direct comparison of measurements obtained by the two satellites. The purpose of this paper was to present the range of analyses that can be performed from this dataset, highlighting methodology aspects and the main outcomes for each instrument. We examined, in turn, the benefit of the tandem in understanding instrument operational modes differences, in assessing inter-satellite differences, and in validating measurement uncertainties. The results highlighted the very good consistency of the Sentinel-3A and B instruments, ensuring the complete inter-operability of the constellation. Tandem comparisons also pave the way for further improvements through harmonization of the sensors (OLCI), correction of internal stray-light sources (SLSTR), or high-frequency processing of SRAL SARM data. This paper provided a comprehensive overview of the main results obtained, as well as insights into some of the results. Finally, we drew the main lessons learned from the Sentinel-3 tandem phase and provided recommendations for future missions.

Topics
  • phase