People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Polido, Mario
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (7/7 displayed)
- 2022Improving Properties of an Experimental Universal Adhesive by Adding a Multifunctional Dendrimer (G-IEMA): Bond Strength and Nanoleakage Evaluationcitations
- 2022Wear of zirconia/leucite glass-ceramics composites: A chewing simulator studycitations
- 2020Dentin Bonding and SEM Analysis of a New Experimental Universal Adhesive System Containing a Dendrimercitations
- 2018Comparative tribological study of two prosthetic dental materials: Zirconia and Vita enamic
- 2018Comparative study of the wear of the pair human teeth/Vita Enamic (R) vs commonly used dental ceramics through chewing simulationcitations
- 2017Effect of bleaching teeth with hydrogen peroxide on the morphology, hydrophilicity, and mechanical and tribological properties of the enamelcitations
- 2011Diffuse Reflectance of Dental Materials After Staining: A Comparative Study
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
Dentin Bonding and SEM Analysis of a New Experimental Universal Adhesive System Containing a Dendrimer
Abstract
Due to their polymerization characteristics, hyper-branched dendrimers have lately shown to be promising candidates for use in dental materials. In this study, a new dental adhesive system was prepared, using a dendrimer derived from 2-isocyanatoethyl methacrylate (G-IEMA), and its adhesive properties were investigated. The exposed dentin was treated with four universal adhesives (UAs): SBU (Scotchbond Universal((TM))), FUT (Futurabond M+((TM))), AE1 (experimental adhesive with Bis-GMA) and AE2 (experimental adhesive with G-IEMA), using Etch & Rinse (ER) or Self Etch (SE) protocols. Composite build-ups were prepared and stored for 24 h at 37 degrees C in distilled water. Composite/dentin beams were prepared with cross-sectional areas of 1 +/- 0.3 mm(2) and mu TBS (Micro-tensile bond strength) test was performed at 0.5 mm/min. Failures modes were evaluated by stereomicroscopy, and bonding interfaces were observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Statistical analysis of mu TBS data was performed using General Linear (GLM) and Linear Mixed Models (LMM). The effect of adhesive type on mu TBS was significant (p = 0.010), with AE1 presenting significantly higher mu TBS than SBU (p = 0.019). No other differences between adhesives were observed. ER showed significantly better results than SE (p = 0.019), and no significant interactions between the adhesives and protocols were determined. Results obtained so far pinpoint the emergence of a new paradigm in the dental materials field, as G-IEMA can be used successfully as an alternative to Bis-GMA.