People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Baun, Anders
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (12/12 displayed)
- 2024Determining ecotoxicity drivers and biodegradation kinetics of discharged chemicals in produced water from oil and gas extraction in the North Sea
- 2024Oxide-Perovskites for Automotive Catalysts Biotransform and Induce Multicomponent Clearance and Hazardcitations
- 2024Behaviour of advanced materials in environmental aquatic media – dissolution kinetics and dispersion stability of perovskite automotive catalystscitations
- 2018Green synthesis of gold and silver nanoparticles from Cannabis sativa (industrial hemp) and their capacity for biofilm inhibitioncitations
- 2016Regulatory Ecotoxicity Testing of Nanomaterials – Proposed Modifications of OECD Test Guidelines Based on Laboratory Experience with Silver and Titanium Dioxide nanoparticles.citations
- 2016Aquatic toxicity testing for hazard identification of engineered nanoparticles
- 2016EU Regulation of Nanobiocides: Challenges in Implementing the Biocidal Product Regulation (BPR)citations
- 2015Engineered Nanoparticle (Eco)Toxicity
- 2013To describe and control exposure in nanoecotoxicology tests
- 2008Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis of Environmental and Health Risks of Nanomaterials
- 2007Categorization framework to aid hazard identification of nanomaterialscitations
- 2006Transfer of hydrophobic contaminants in urban runoff particles to benthic organisms estimated by an in vitro bioaccessibility testcitations
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
EU Regulation of Nanobiocides: Challenges in Implementing the Biocidal Product Regulation (BPR)
Abstract
The Biocidal Products Regulation (BPR) contains several provisions for nanomaterials (NMs) and is the first regulation in the European Union to require specific testing and risk assessment for the NM form of a biocidal substance as a part of the information requirements. Ecotoxicological data are one of the pillars of the information requirements in the BPR, but there are currently no standard test guidelines for the ecotoxicity testing of NMs. The overall objective of this work was to investigate the implications of the introduction of nano-specific testing requirements in the BPR and to explore how these might be fulfilled in the case of copper oxide nanoparticles. While there is information and data available in the open literature that could be used to fulfill the BPR information requirements, most of the studies do not take the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development’s nanospecific test guidelines into consideration. This makes it difficult for companies as well as regulators to fulfill the BPR information requirements for nanomaterials. In order to enable a nanospecific risk assessment, best practices need to be developed regarding stock suspension preparation and characterization, exposure suspensions preparation, and for conducting ecotoxicological test.