Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Wood, Jonathan

  • Google
  • 6
  • 41
  • 127

Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (6/6 displayed)

  • 2024Damage Behavior with Atomic Force Microscopy on Anti-Bacterial Nanostructure Arrays3citations
  • 2024Exploring the Challenges of Characterising Surface Topography of Polymer–Nanoparticle Composites3citations
  • 2022Bio-Inspired Nanostructured Ti-6Al-4V Alloy31citations
  • 2022Spiked Titanium Nanostructures That Inhibit Anaerobic Dental Pathogens19citations
  • 2022Nanomechanical tribological characterisation of nanostructured titanium alloy surfaces using AFM12citations
  • 2019Laser-wakefield accelerators for high-resolution X-ray imaging of complex microstructures59citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Barker, Dan
3 / 4 shared
Dabare, Ruvini
1 / 1 shared
Burzava, Anouck
1 / 2 shared
Brown, Toby
1 / 1 shared
Visalakshan, Rahul M.
1 / 2 shared
Palms, Dennis
2 / 2 shared
Ninan, Neethu
1 / 6 shared
Zilm, Peter
1 / 1 shared
Hasan, Jafar
2 / 9 shared
Chart of publication period
2024
2022
2019

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Barker, Dan
  • Dabare, Ruvini
  • Burzava, Anouck
  • Brown, Toby
  • Visalakshan, Rahul M.
  • Palms, Dennis
  • Ninan, Neethu
  • Zilm, Peter
  • Hasan, Jafar
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Exploring the Challenges of Characterising Surface Topography of Polymer–Nanoparticle Composites

  • Dabare, Ruvini
  • Wood, Jonathan
Abstract

<p>Nanomechanical testing plays a crucial role in evaluating surfaces containing nanoparticles. Testing verifies surface performance concerning their intended function and detects any potential shortcomings in operational standards. Recognising that nanostructured surfaces are not always straightforward or uniform is essential. The chemical composition and morphology of these surfaces determine the end-point functionality. This can entail a layered surface using materials in contrast to each other that may require further modification after nanomechanical testing to pass performance and quality standards. Nanomechanical analysis of a structured surface consisting of a poly-methyl oxazoline film base functionalised with colloidal gold nanoparticles was demonstrated using an atomic force microscope (AFM). AFM nanomechanical testing investigated the overall substrate architecture’s topographical, friction, adhesion, and wear parameters. Limitations towards its potential operation as a biomaterial were also addressed. This was demonstrated by using the AFM cantilever to apply various forces and break the bonds between the polymer film and gold nanoparticles. The AFM instrument offers an insight to the behaviour of low-modulus surface against a higher-modulus nanoparticle. This paper details the bonding and reaction limitations between these materials on the application of an externally applied force. The application of this interaction is highly scrutinised to highlight the potential limitations of a functionalised surface. These findings highlight the importance of conducting comprehensive nanomechanical testing to address concerns related to fabricating intricate biomaterial surfaces featuring nanostructures.</p>

Topics
  • nanoparticle
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • polymer
  • atomic force microscopy
  • gold
  • layered
  • composite
  • chemical composition
  • positron annihilation lifetime spectroscopy
  • Photoacoustic spectroscopy