Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Bauer, Wolfgang

  • Google
  • 8
  • 30
  • 85

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (8/8 displayed)

  • 2024Fusion of cellulose microspheres with pulp fibers: Creating an unconventional type of paper1citations
  • 2023Extensive Characterization of Alginate, Chitosan and Microfibrillated Cellulose Cast Films to Assess their Suitability as Barrier Coating for Paper and Board13citations
  • 2021How cellulose nanofibrils and cellulose microparticles impact paper strength—A visualization approach20citations
  • 2021Reinforcement effect of pulp fines and microfibrillated cellulose in highly densified binderless paperboards29citations
  • 2020Comparison of the Functional Barrier Properties of Chitosan Acetate Films with Conventionally Applied Polymers5citations
  • 2019Cobalt Ferrite Nanoparticles for Three-Dimensional Visualization of Micro- and Nanostructured Cellulose in Paper7citations
  • 2019Three Dimensional Localization and Visualization of Paper Fines in Sheetscitations
  • 2019Affinity of Serum Albumin and Fibrinogen to Cellulose, Its Hydrophobic Derivatives and Blends10citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Bakhshi, Adelheid
1 / 1 shared
Spirk, Stefan
4 / 21 shared
Fischer, Johanna
1 / 7 shared
Fischer, Steffen
1 / 8 shared
Scheer, Alexa
1 / 1 shared
Mayrhofer, Anna
1 / 1 shared
Kopacic, Samir
2 / 2 shared
Eckhart, Rene
4 / 4 shared
Zabler, Simon
3 / 6 shared
Nypelö, Tiina
1 / 15 shared
Zankel, Armin
3 / 4 shared
Bardet, Sylvia M.
1 / 1 shared
Hobisch, Mathias A.
1 / 1 shared
Leitner, Johannes
1 / 1 shared
Winter, Armin
1 / 2 shared
Veigel, Stefan
1 / 6 shared
Gindl-Altmutter, Wolfgang
1 / 6 shared
Mandlez, Daniel
1 / 1 shared
Leitner, Erich
1 / 1 shared
Hochegger, Andrea
1 / 1 shared
Fischer, Wolfgang Johann
1 / 1 shared
Hobisch, Mathias
2 / 3 shared
Müller, Dominik
2 / 4 shared
Fischer, Wolfgang
1 / 5 shared
Mozetič, Miran
1 / 10 shared
Bračič, Matej
1 / 8 shared
Prof
1 / 18 shared
Kargl, Rupert
1 / 23 shared
Stana Kleinschek, Karin
1 / 46 shared
Resnik, Matic
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2024
2023
2021
2020
2019

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Bakhshi, Adelheid
  • Spirk, Stefan
  • Fischer, Johanna
  • Fischer, Steffen
  • Scheer, Alexa
  • Mayrhofer, Anna
  • Kopacic, Samir
  • Eckhart, Rene
  • Zabler, Simon
  • Nypelö, Tiina
  • Zankel, Armin
  • Bardet, Sylvia M.
  • Hobisch, Mathias A.
  • Leitner, Johannes
  • Winter, Armin
  • Veigel, Stefan
  • Gindl-Altmutter, Wolfgang
  • Mandlez, Daniel
  • Leitner, Erich
  • Hochegger, Andrea
  • Fischer, Wolfgang Johann
  • Hobisch, Mathias
  • Müller, Dominik
  • Fischer, Wolfgang
  • Mozetič, Miran
  • Bračič, Matej
  • Prof
  • Kargl, Rupert
  • Stana Kleinschek, Karin
  • Resnik, Matic
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Comparison of the Functional Barrier Properties of Chitosan Acetate Films with Conventionally Applied Polymers

  • Bauer, Wolfgang
  • Leitner, Erich
  • Hochegger, Andrea
  • Kopacic, Samir
Abstract

The current demand to cut back on the use of plastic materials has brought a major boost to the search for bio-based alternatives. Not only are plastic bags and primary food packaging under scrutiny here, but also those materials used as functional barriers to reduce, for example, the migration of mineral oil hydrocarbons (MOH) from recycled paper and board packaging. Most of the barriers now in use are synthetic, often have only moderate barrier functionalities and in addition reduce the environmentally-friendly character of cellulose-based materials. Against this background, bio-based polymers have been evaluated in terms of their functional barrier properties. Chitosan was found to be among the best performers in these materials. In this study, the behavior of a lab-made chitosan acetate film was compared with conventionally produced polymer films. The two-sided migration experiment described recently was used to determine the barrier properties of the tested materials. This not only allowed to test the intrinsic migration of the films and the permeation through them, but also to simulate real packaging situations by using a recycled paper as donor for MOH. The migrated fractions were determined using gas-chromatography-based techniques. While the conventionally produced polymer films showed only moderate barrier function, excellent results were seen for the biopolymer. It reduced the migration from the recycled paper to not detectable, singling it out as a good alternative to conventional materials.

Topics
  • mineral
  • polymer
  • experiment
  • cellulose
  • chromatography