People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Taylor, Scott
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (11/11 displayed)
- 2024An X-ray diffraction study of the influence of linear and changing strain paths on strain and texture evolution in AA6111-T4 aluminium alloy sheetscitations
- 2024Effect of continuous and discontinuous non-proportional loadings on formability of DX54 sheet materialcitations
- 2022Identifying Optimal Hot Forming Conditions for AA6010 Alloy by Means of Elevated Temperature Tensile Testingcitations
- 2022A Novel Testing Methodology for In Situ Microstructural Characterisation During Continuous Strain Path Changecitations
- 2022Development of a novel testing methodology for in-situ microstructural characterisation during continuous strain path changecitations
- 2020Microstructural evolution of 316L austenitic stainless steel during in-situ biaxial deformation and annealingcitations
- 2019Comparison of formability and microstructural evolution of C106 copper and 316L stainless steelcitations
- 2018Comparison of superplastic forming abilities of as‐cast AZ91 magnesium alloy prepared by twin roll casting and WE43 magnesium alloycitations
- 2017Predicting the warm forming behavior of WE43 and AA5086 alloyscitations
- 2016Development of a hot gas formable AA7XXX alloy & hybrid SPF/warm forming technology for light-weight automotive structures in niche vehicle manufacturing
- 2010Investigation into the improved dispersion of nickel oxide over the surface of SOFC tubular anodes
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
Identifying Optimal Hot Forming Conditions for AA6010 Alloy by Means of Elevated Temperature Tensile Testing
Abstract
<jats:p>AA6010 in the F temper was investigated using a Gleeble 3800 test rig across a range of temperatures (350–550 °C) and strain rates (1 × 10−1 s−1 1 × 101 s−1) to identify optimal forming conditions. Post-forming electron back-scattered diffraction analysis was conducted to identify the mechanisms responsible for the material formability. Optimal forming conditions were observed to be 500 °C and a strain rate of 1 × 10−1 s−1, with clear evidence of dynamic recrystallisation observed, this being the dominant mechanism responsible for the increased formability. Peak yield strength of 335 MPa was achieved using a rapid aging treatment of 205 °C for one hour.</jats:p>