Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Chen, Muh-Jang

  • Google
  • 1
  • 3
  • 3

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2022The Challenges of Modeling Defect Behavior and Plasticity across Spatial and Temporal Scales: A Case Study of Metal Bilayer Impact3citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Brenner, Donald
1 / 2 shared
Granger, Leah
1 / 1 shared
Zikry, Mohammed
1 / 3 shared
Chart of publication period
2022

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Brenner, Donald
  • Granger, Leah
  • Zikry, Mohammed
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

The Challenges of Modeling Defect Behavior and Plasticity across Spatial and Temporal Scales: A Case Study of Metal Bilayer Impact

  • Chen, Muh-Jang
  • Brenner, Donald
  • Granger, Leah
  • Zikry, Mohammed
Abstract

<jats:p>Atomistic molecular dynamics (MD) and a microstructural dislocation density-based crystalline plasticity (DCP) framework were used together across time scales varying from picoseconds to nanoseconds and length scales spanning from angstroms to micrometers to model a buried copper–nickel interface subjected to high strain rates. The nucleation and evolution of defects, such as dislocations and stacking faults, as well as large inelastic strain accumulations and wave-induced stress reflections were physically represented in both approaches. Both methods showed similar qualitative behavior, such as defects originating along the impactor edges, a dominance of Shockley partial dislocations, and non-continuous dislocation distributions across the buried interface. The favorable comparison between methods justifies assumptions used in both, to model phenomena, such as the nucleation and interactions of single defects and partials with reflected tensile waves, based on MD predictions, which are consistent with the evolution of perfect and partial dislocation densities as predicted by DCP. This substantiates how the nanoscale as modeled by MD is representative of microstructural behavior as modeled by DCP.</jats:p>

Topics
  • density
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • nickel
  • molecular dynamics
  • dislocation
  • copper
  • plasticity
  • stacking fault