People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Reis, Ana
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (15/15 displayed)
- 2023Low- and High-Pressure Casting Aluminum Alloys: A Reviewcitations
- 2023Upcycling Aluminium Chips to Powder Feedstocks for Powder Metallurgy Applicationscitations
- 2023Additively Manufactured High-Strength Aluminum Alloys: A Reviewcitations
- 2022Damage Evolution Simulations via a Coupled Crystal Plasticity and Cohesive Zone Model for Additively Manufactured Austenitic SS 316L DED Componentscitations
- 2022Tensile Properties of As-Built 18Ni300 Maraging Steel Produced by DEDcitations
- 2022Numerical predictions of orthogonal cutting–induced residual stress of super alloy Inconel 718 considering dynamic recrystallizationcitations
- 2022An Adaptive Thermal Finite Element Simulation of Direct Energy Deposition With Reinforcement Learning: A Conceptual Frameworkcitations
- 2021Fracture Prediction Based on Evaluation of Initial Porosity Induced By Direct Energy Depositioncitations
- 2021Comparison of the machinability of the 316L and 18Ni300 additively manufactured steels based on turning testscitations
- 2021Numerical-experimental plastic-damage characterisation of additively manufactured 18ni300 maraging steel by means of multiaxial double-notched specimenscitations
- 2021Optimization of Direct Laser Deposition of a Martensitic Steel Powder (Metco 42C) on 42CrMo4 Steelcitations
- 2021An innovation in finite element simulation via crystal plasticity assessment of grain morphology effect on sheet metal formabilitycitations
- 2021Inconel 625/AISI 413 Stainless Steel Functionally Graded Material Produced by Direct Laser Depositioncitations
- 2021Deposition of Nickel-Based Superalloy Claddings on Low Alloy Structural Steel by Direct Laser Depositioncitations
- 2018Characterizing fracture forming limit and shear fracture forming limit for sheet metalscitations
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
Damage Evolution Simulations via a Coupled Crystal Plasticity and Cohesive Zone Model for Additively Manufactured Austenitic SS 316L DED Components
Abstract
<jats:p>This study presents a microstructural model applicable to additively manufactured (AM) austenitic SS 316L components fabricated via a direct energy deposition (DED) process. The model is primarily intended to give an understanding of the effect of microscale and mesoscale features, such as grains and melt pool sizes, on the mechanical properties of manufactured components. Based on experimental observations, initial assumptions for the numerical model regarding grain size and melt pool dimensions were considered. Experimental observations based on miniature-sized 316L stainless steel DED-fabricated samples were carried out to shed light on the deformation mechanism of FCC materials at the grain scale. Furthermore, the dependency of latent strain hardening parameters based on the Bassani–Wu hardening model for a single crystal scale is investigated, where the Voronoi tessellation method and probability theory are utilized for the definition of the grain distribution. A hierarchical polycrystalline modeling methodology based on a representative volume element (RVE) with the realistic impact of grain boundaries was adopted for fracture assessment of the AM parts. To qualify the validity of process–structure–property relationships, cohesive zone damage surfaces were used between melt pool boundaries as the predefined initial cracks and the performance of the model is validated based on the experimental observations.</jats:p>