People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Oster, Simon
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (12/12 displayed)
- 2024Local porosity prediction in metal powder bed fusion using in-situ thermography: A comparative study of machine learning techniquescitations
- 2024Comparison of NIR and SWIR thermography for defect detection in Laser Powder Bed Fusioncitations
- 2023In-situ defect detection for laser powder bed fusion with active laser thermography
- 2023From Thermographic In-situ Monitoring to Porosity Detection – A Deep Learning Framework for Quality Control in Laser Powder Bed Fusion
- 2023In-situ monitoring of the laser powder bed fusion process by thermography, optical tomography and melt pool monitoring for defect detection
- 2023Potentials and challenges of deep-learning-assisted porosity prediction based on thermographic in-situ monitoring in laser powder bed fusioncitations
- 2022On the registration of thermographic in situ monitoring data and computed tomography reference data in the scope of defect prediction in laser powder bed fusioncitations
- 2022On the Registration of Thermographic In Situ Monitoring Data and Computed Tomography Reference Data in the Scope of Defect Prediction in Laser Powder Bed Fusioncitations
- 2021Multispectral in-situ monitoring of a L-PBF manufacturing process using three thermographic camera systems
- 2021Can Potential Defects in LPBF Be Healed from the Laser Exposure of Subsequent Layers? A Quantitative Studycitations
- 2021Investigation of the thermal history of L-PBF metal parts by feature extraction from in-situ SWIR thermographycitations
- 2021Can potential defects in LPBF be healed from the laser exposure of subsequent layers?citations
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
On the Registration of Thermographic In Situ Monitoring Data and Computed Tomography Reference Data in the Scope of Defect Prediction in Laser Powder Bed Fusion
Abstract
<jats:p>The detection of internal irregularities is crucial for quality assessment in metal-based additive manufacturing (AM) technologies such as laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF). The utilization of in-process thermography as an in situ monitoring tool in combination with post-process X-ray micro computed tomography (XCT) as a reference technique has shown great potential for this aim. Due to the small irregularity dimensions, a precise registration of the datasets is necessary as a requirement for correlation. In this study, the registration of thermography and XCT reference datasets of a cylindric specimen containing keyhole pores is carried out for the development of a porosity prediction model. The considered datasets show variations in shape, data type and dimensionality, especially due to shrinkage and material elevation effects present in the manufactured part. Since the resulting deformations are challenging for registration, a novel preprocessing methodology is introduced that involves an adaptive volume adjustment algorithm which is based on the porosity distribution in the specimen. Thus, the implementation of a simple three-dimensional image-to-image registration is enabled. The results demonstrate the influence of the part deformation on the resulting porosity location and the importance of registration in terms of irregularity prediction.</jats:p>