Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Wilke, Alisa

  • Google
  • 1
  • 8
  • 4

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2021On the Q&P Potential of a Commercial Spring Steel4citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Lampke, Thomas
1 / 388 shared
Landgraf, Pierre
1 / 6 shared
Dieck, Sebastian
1 / 3 shared
Härtel, Markus
1 / 3 shared
Grund, Thomas
1 / 24 shared
Neukirchner, Heiko
1 / 1 shared
Halle, Thorsten
1 / 10 shared
Wappler, Sebastian
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2021

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Lampke, Thomas
  • Landgraf, Pierre
  • Dieck, Sebastian
  • Härtel, Markus
  • Grund, Thomas
  • Neukirchner, Heiko
  • Halle, Thorsten
  • Wappler, Sebastian
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

On the Q&P Potential of a Commercial Spring Steel

  • Lampke, Thomas
  • Landgraf, Pierre
  • Dieck, Sebastian
  • Härtel, Markus
  • Grund, Thomas
  • Wilke, Alisa
  • Neukirchner, Heiko
  • Halle, Thorsten
  • Wappler, Sebastian
Abstract

<jats:p>Over the last years heat treatment concept of “quenching and partitioning” (Q&amp;P) has reached popularity for its ability to precisely adjust material properties to desired values. Mostly, Q&amp;P process are applied on tailor-made materials with high purities or prototype alloys. The research in hand presents the whole routine of how to investigate the potential of a commercial 0.54C-1.45Si-0.71Mn spring steel in terms of Q&amp;P heat treatment from lab scale in dilatometer measurements to widely used inductive heat treatment on larger scale. In order to obtain the small process window for this material we were focusing on the interplay of the formed microstructure and the resulting mechanical properties in hardness measurements, compression tests as well as tensile tests. After full austenitizing, three different Q&amp;P processing routes were applied. Microstructural analyses by optical microscopy, Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Electron Backscatter Diffraction (EBSD) exhibit a condition with 6.4% and 15% volume fraction of fine distributed retained austenite. Interestingly, the 15% of retained austenite developed during the partitioning heat treatment. Contradictory to our expectations, tensile and compression testing were showing that the 6.4% condition achieved improved mechanical properties compared to the 15% retained austenite condition. The remarkable conclusion is that not only volume fraction and fine distribution of retained austenite determines the potential of improving mechanical properties by Q&amp;P in commercial alloys: also the process step when the retained austenite is developing as well as occurring parallel formation of carbides may strongly influence this potential.</jats:p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • microstructure
  • scanning electron microscopy
  • carbide
  • hardness
  • compression test
  • electron backscatter diffraction
  • optical microscopy
  • quenching
  • spring steel