| People | Locations | Statistics |
|---|---|---|
| Naji, M. |
| |
| Motta, Antonella |
| |
| Aletan, Dirar |
| |
| Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
| Ertürk, Emre |
| |
| Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
| Kononenko, Denys |
| |
| Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
| Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
| Bih, L. |
| |
| Casati, R. |
| |
| Muller, Hermance |
| |
| Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
| Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
| Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
| Azam, Siraj |
| |
| Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
| Blanpain, Bart |
| |
| Ali, M. A. |
| |
| Popa, V. |
| |
| Rančić, M. |
| |
| Ollier, Nadège |
| |
| Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
| Landes, Michael |
| |
| Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Mcgarrigle, Cormac
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (11/11 displayed)
- 2022Influence of extrusion parameters on filled polyphenylsulfone tufting yarns on open-hole tensile strengthcitations
- 2022Characterization of continuous carbon fibre reinforced 3D printed polymer composites with varying fibre volume fractionscitations
- 2022Elastic Modulus and Flatwise (Through-Thickness) Tensile Strength of Continuous Carbon Fibre Reinforced 3D Printed Polymer Compositescitations
- 2021Comparison of Properties and Bead Geometry in MIG and CMT Single Layer Samples for WAAM Applicationscitations
- 2021Influence of Binder Float Length on the Out-of-Plane and Axial Impact Performance of 3D Woven Compositescitations
- 2021Thread-stripping test procedures leading to factors of safety data for friction-drilled holes in thin-section aluminium alloycitations
- 2020Improved crush energy absorption in 3D woven composites by pick density modificationcitations
- 2019Influence of Textile Architecture on the Mechanical Properties of 3D Woven Carbon Composites
- 2019Comparative studies of structure property relationship between glass/epoxy and carbon/epoxy 3D woven composites
- 2019Energy Absorption Mechanisms in Layer-to-Layer 3D Woven Composites
- 2019Improved Energy Absorption in 3D Woven Composites by Weave Parameter Manipulationcitations
Places of action
| Organizations | Location | People |
|---|
document
Comparison of Properties and Bead Geometry in MIG and CMT Single Layer Samples for WAAM Applications
Abstract
The process of Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing (WAAM) utilizes arc welding technology to fabricate metallic components by depositing material in a selective layered fashion. Several welding processes exist that can achieve this layered deposition strategy. Gas Metal Arc Welding (GMAW) derived processes are commonly favored for their high deposition rates (1–4 kg/h) and minimal torch reorientation required during deposition. A range of GMAW processes are available; all of which have different material transfer modes and thermal energy input ranges and the resultant metallic structures formed from these processes can vary in their mechanical properties and morphology. This work will investigate single-layer deposition and vary the process parameters and process mode to observe responses in mechanical properties, bead geometry and deposition rate. The process modes selected for this study were GMAW derived process of Metal Inert Gas (MIG) and Cold Metal Transfer (CMT). Characterization of parameter sets revealed relationships between torch travel speeds, wire feed speeds and the specimen properties and proportions. Differences were observed in the cross-sectional bead geometry and deposition rates when comparing MIG and CMT samples though the influence of process mode on mechanical properties was less significant compared to process parameter selection.