Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Versiani, Marco A.

  • Google
  • 6
  • 17
  • 86

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (6/6 displayed)

  • 2024Comprehensive Assessment of Cyclic Fatigue Strength in Five Multiple-File Nickel–Titanium Endodontic Systems2citations
  • 2024Multimethod analysis of large- and low-tapered single file reciprocating instruments5citations
  • 2023Diamondlike Carbon Surface Treatment Improves the Fatigue Resistance of Ultrasonic Tips4citations
  • 2023Multimethod analysis of three rotary instruments produced by electric discharge machining technology15citations
  • 2022Multimethod Assessment of Design, Metallurgical, and Mechanical Characteristics of Original and Counterfeit ProGlider Instruments3citations
  • 2020Mechanical Tests, Metallurgical Characterization, and Shaping Ability of Nickel-Titanium Rotary Instruments: A Multimethod Research57citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Martins, Jorge N. R.
6 / 15 shared
Marques, Duarte
3 / 11 shared
Silva, Emmanuel J. N. L.
5 / 7 shared
Fernandes, Francisco Manuel Braz
6 / 124 shared
Peña-Bengoa, Fernando
1 / 1 shared
Ajuz, Natasha C.
2 / 2 shared
Silva, Emmanuel João Nogueira Leal
1 / 6 shared
Vieira, Victor T. L.
4 / 5 shared
Pinto, Ricardo
1 / 5 shared
Ritopereira, Mário
1 / 1 shared
Moreira, Thiago
1 / 1 shared
Crozeta, Bruno M.
1 / 1 shared
Antunes, Bernardo R.
1 / 1 shared
Lima, Carolina O.
2 / 2 shared
Caramês, João
1 / 6 shared
Ginjeira, António
1 / 7 shared
De-Deus, Gustavo
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2024
2023
2022
2020

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Martins, Jorge N. R.
  • Marques, Duarte
  • Silva, Emmanuel J. N. L.
  • Fernandes, Francisco Manuel Braz
  • Peña-Bengoa, Fernando
  • Ajuz, Natasha C.
  • Silva, Emmanuel João Nogueira Leal
  • Vieira, Victor T. L.
  • Pinto, Ricardo
  • Ritopereira, Mário
  • Moreira, Thiago
  • Crozeta, Bruno M.
  • Antunes, Bernardo R.
  • Lima, Carolina O.
  • Caramês, João
  • Ginjeira, António
  • De-Deus, Gustavo
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Comprehensive Assessment of Cyclic Fatigue Strength in Five Multiple-File Nickel–Titanium Endodontic Systems

  • Martins, Jorge N. R.
  • Versiani, Marco A.
  • Marques, Duarte
  • Silva, Emmanuel J. N. L.
  • Fernandes, Francisco Manuel Braz
Abstract

The resistance of nickel–titanium endodontic instruments against cyclic fatigue failure remains a significant concern in clinical settings. This study aimed to assess the cyclic fatigue strength of five nickel–titanium rotary systems, while correlating the results with the instruments’ geometric and metallurgical characteristics. A total of 250 new instruments (sizes S1/A1, S2/A2, F1/B1, F2/B2, F3/B3) from ProTaper Gold, ProTaper Universal, Premium Taper Gold, Go-Taper Flex, and U-Files systems underwent mechanical testing. Prior to experimental procedures, all instruments were meticulously inspected to identify irregularities that could affect the investigation. Using a stereomicroscope, design characteristics such as the number of spirals, length, spirals per millimeter, and average helical angle of the active blade were determined. The surface finishing characteristics of the instruments were examined using a scanning electron microscope. Differential scanning calorimetry was employed to establish the instruments’ phase transformation temperatures, while energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy was utilized to analyze the elemental composition of the alloy. The instruments were subjected to cyclic fatigue testing within a stainless steel non-tapered artificial canal featuring a 6 mm radius and 86 degrees of curvature. Appropriate statistical tests were applied to compare groups, considering a significance level of 0.05. The assessed design characteristics varied depending on the instrument type. The least irregular surface finishing was observed in U-Files and Premium Taper Gold files, while the most irregular surface was noted in Go-Taper Flex. All instruments exhibited near-equiatomic proportions of nickel and titanium elements, whereas ProTaper Universal and U-Files instruments demonstrated lower phase transformation temperatures compared to their counterparts. Larger-sized instruments, as well as ProTaper Universal and U-Files, tended to display lower cyclic fatigue strength results. Overall, the design, metallurgical, and cyclic fatigue outcomes varied among instruments and systems. Understanding these outcomes may assist clinicians in making more informed decisions regarding instrument selection.

Topics
  • surface
  • nickel
  • stainless steel
  • phase
  • gold
  • strength
  • fatigue
  • differential scanning calorimetry
  • titanium
  • Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy
  • fatigue testing