| People | Locations | Statistics |
|---|---|---|
| Naji, M. |
| |
| Motta, Antonella |
| |
| Aletan, Dirar |
| |
| Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
| Ertürk, Emre |
| |
| Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
| Kononenko, Denys |
| |
| Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
| Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
| Bih, L. |
| |
| Casati, R. |
| |
| Muller, Hermance |
| |
| Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
| Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
| Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
| Azam, Siraj |
| |
| Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
| Blanpain, Bart |
| |
| Ali, M. A. |
| |
| Popa, V. |
| |
| Rančić, M. |
| |
| Ollier, Nadège |
| |
| Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
| Landes, Michael |
| |
| Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Brząkalski, Dariusz
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (14/14 displayed)
- 2024Nanocomposites Based on Thermoplastic Acrylic Resin with the Addition of Chemically Modified Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubescitations
- 2023Beeswax as a natural alternative to synthetic waxes for fabrication of PLA/diatomaceous earth compositescitations
- 2023Feldspar-Modified Methacrylic Composite for Fabrication of Prosthetic Teethcitations
- 2023Organosilicon Compounds in Hot-Melt Adhesive Technologiescitations
- 2023Polyamide 11 Composites Reinforced with Diatomite Biofiller—Mechanical, Rheological and Crystallization Propertiescitations
- 2022Aspects and Principles of Material Connections in Restorative Dentistry—A Comprehensive Reviewcitations
- 2022Where ppm Quantities of Silsesquioxanes Make a Difference—Silanes and Cage Siloxanes as TiO<inf>2</inf> Dispersants and Stabilizers for Pigmented Epoxy Resinscitations
- 2022Influence of Diatomaceous Earth Particle Size on Mechanical Properties of PLA/Diatomaceous Earth Compositescitations
- 2022Novel Multifunctional Spherosilicate-Based Coupling Agents for Improved Bond Strength and Quality in Restorative Dentistrycitations
- 2021Methodological Aspects of Obtaining and Characterizing Composites Based on Biogenic Diatomaceous Silica and Epoxy Resinscitations
- 2021A New Method of Diatomaceous Earth Fractionation—A Bio-Raw Material Source for Epoxy-Based Compositescitations
- 2021Why POSS-Type Compounds Should Be Considered Nanomodifiers, Not Nanofillers—A Polypropylene Blends Case Studycitations
- 2020Highly bulky spherosilicates as functional additives for polyethylene processing--Influence on mechanical and thermal propertiescitations
- 2019The influence of surface physicochemistry of solid fillers on dispersion in polyurea systems
Places of action
| Organizations | Location | People |
|---|
article
Feldspar-Modified Methacrylic Composite for Fabrication of Prosthetic Teeth
Abstract
<jats:p>This study was aimed at investigating poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA), modified with a silanized feldspar filler at 10 wt.% and 30 wt.%, as a dental material system for the production of prosthetic teeth. Samples of this composite were subjected to a compressive strength test, three-layer methacrylic teeth were fabricated with the said materials, and their connection to a denture plate was examined. The biocompatibility of the materials was assessed via cytotoxicity tests on human gingival fibroblasts (HGFs) and Chinese hamster ovarian cells (CHO-K1). The addition of feldspar significantly improved the material’s compressive strength, with neat PMMA reaching 107 MPa, and the addition of 30% feldspar raising it up to 159 MPa. As observed, composite teeth (cervical part made of neat PMMA, dentin with 10 wt.%, and enamel with 30 wt.% of feldspar) had good adhesion to the denture plate. Neither of the tested materials revealed any cytotoxic effects. In the case of hamster fibroblasts, increased cell viability was observed, with only morphological changes being noticed. Samples containing 10% or 30% of inorganic filler were determined to be safe for treated cells. The use of silanized feldspar to fabricate composite teeth increased their hardness, which is of significant clinical importance for the duration of use of non-retained dentures.</jats:p>