Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Khan, Rashid

  • Google
  • 3
  • 12
  • 7

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (3/3 displayed)

  • 2024Influence of washing with sodium lauryl sulphate (SLS) surfactant on different properties of ramie fibres7citations
  • 2024Indentation Behavior Assessment of As-Built, Solution, and Artificial Aged Heat-Treated Selective Laser Melting Specimens of AlSi10Mgcitations
  • 2023Reduced Slit Rolling Power in Rebar Steel Productioncitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Santulli, Carlo
1 / 28 shared
Tadepalli, Srinivas
1 / 1 shared
Murugesan, Thulasi Mani
1 / 2 shared
Palanisamy, Sivasubramanian
1 / 12 shared
Palaniappan, Murugesan
1 / 4 shared
Ataya, Sabbah
2 / 7 shared
Siddiqui, Ali Khursheed
1 / 1 shared
Yang, Junzhou
1 / 1 shared
Alsaleh, Naser
1 / 9 shared
Djuansjah, Joy
1 / 1 shared
Essa, Khamis
1 / 46 shared
Elgammal, Islam
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2024
2023

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Santulli, Carlo
  • Tadepalli, Srinivas
  • Murugesan, Thulasi Mani
  • Palanisamy, Sivasubramanian
  • Palaniappan, Murugesan
  • Ataya, Sabbah
  • Siddiqui, Ali Khursheed
  • Yang, Junzhou
  • Alsaleh, Naser
  • Djuansjah, Joy
  • Essa, Khamis
  • Elgammal, Islam
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Reduced Slit Rolling Power in Rebar Steel Production

  • Essa, Khamis
  • Elgammal, Islam
  • Ataya, Sabbah
  • Khan, Rashid
Abstract

The rolling process of rebar steel production is one of the well established manufacturing processes; however, it should be subjected to revision and redesign for productivity enhancement and power reduction throughout the slit rolling process. In this work, slitting passes are extensively reviewed and modified for the attainment of better rolling stability and reduction in power consumption. The study has been applied for grade B400B-R Egyptian rebar steel, which is equivalent to steel grade ASTM A615M, Grade 40. Traditionally, the rolled strip in the rolling pass is edged before implementing a slitting pass using grooved rolls; this produces a single barreled strip. This single barrel form causes instability in the next slitting stand on the pressing by the slitting roll knife. Multiple industrial trials are attempted to achieve the deformation of the edging stand using a grooveless roll. As a result, a double barreled slab is produced. In parallel, finite element simulations of the edging pass are performed using grooved and grooveless rolls, and similar slab geometry with single and double barreled form are produced. In addition, further finite element simulations of the slitting stand are execute using idealized single barreled strips. The power calculated by the FE simulations of the single barreled strip is (245 kW), which is in acceptable agreement with the experimental observations in the industrial process (216 kW). This result validates the FE modeling parameters such as material model and boundary conditions. The FE modeling is extended to the slit rolling stand of a double barreled strip, which was previously produced by the grooveless edging rolls. It is found that the power consumption is (165 kW) 12% lower than the power consumed (185 kW) for slitting the single barreled strip.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • simulation
  • steel
  • positron annihilation lifetime spectroscopy
  • Photoacoustic spectroscopy