Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Nain, Vaibhav

  • Google
  • 4
  • 3
  • 29

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (4/4 displayed)

  • 2022Conventional Meso-Scale and Time-Efficient Sub-Track-Scale Thermomechanical Model for Directed Energy Deposition5citations
  • 2022Conventional Meso-Scale and Time-Efficient Sub-Track-Scale Thermomechanical Model for Directed Energy Deposition5citations
  • 2022Numerical modeling for large-scale parts fabricated by Directed Energy Deposition2citations
  • 2021Development of an Elongated Ellipsoid Heat Source Model to Reduce Computation Time for Directed Energy Deposition Process17citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Boisselier, Didier
2 / 8 shared
Carin, Muriel
2 / 21 shared
Engel, Thierry
2 / 3 shared
Chart of publication period
2022
2021

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Boisselier, Didier
  • Carin, Muriel
  • Engel, Thierry
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Conventional Meso-Scale and Time-Efficient Sub-Track-Scale Thermomechanical Model for Directed Energy Deposition

  • Nain, Vaibhav
Abstract

<jats:p>Thermally-induced distortion and residual stresses in parts fabricated by the additive manufacturing (AM) process can lead to part rejection and failure. Still, the understanding of thermo–mechanical behavior induced due to the process physics in AM process is a complex task that depends upon process and material parameters. In this work, a 3D thermo-elasto-plastic model is proposed to predict the thermo–mechanical behavior (thermal and distortion field) in the laser-directed energy deposition (LDED) process using the finite element method (FEM). The predicted thermo–mechanical responses are compared to stainless steel 316L (SS 316L) deposition, with single and double bead 42-layer wall samples subject to different inter-layer dwell times, which govern the thermal response of deposited parts in LDED. In this work, the inter-layer dwell times used in experiments vary from 0 to 10 s. Based on past research into the LDED process, it is assumed that fusion and thermal cycle-induced annealing leads to stress relaxation in the material, and is accounted for in the model by instantaneously removing stresses beyond an inversely calibrated relaxation temperature. The model predicts that, for SS 316L, an increase in dwell time leads to a decrease in in situ and post-process distortion values. Moreover, increasing the number of beads leads to an increase in in situ and post-process distortion values. The calibrated numerical model’s predictions are accurate when compared with in situ and post-process experimental measurements. Finally, an elongated ellipsoid heat source model is proposed to speed up the simulation.</jats:p>

Topics
  • Deposition
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • polymer
  • stainless steel
  • experiment
  • simulation
  • annealing
  • directed energy deposition