Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Rossi, S.

  • Google
  • 11
  • 55
  • 104

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (11/11 displayed)

  • 2022Comparison of Titanium and PEEK Medical Plastic Implant Materials for Their Bacterial Biofilm Formation Properties.21citations
  • 2022Comparison of titanium and PEEK Medical plastic implant materials for their bacterial biofilm formation propertiescitations
  • 2022Effect of Surface Tooling Techniques of Medical Titanium Implants on Bacterial Biofilm Formation In Vitro.6citations
  • 2021Bionics-based surgical training using 3D printed photopolymers and smart devicescitations
  • 20213D printed masks for powders and viruses safety protection using food grade polymers: Empirical tests20citations
  • 2020Assessment of spring waters from Lourdes (France) by contact angle method5citations
  • 2019Chitosan Oleate Coated Poly Lactic-Glycolic Acid (PLGA) Nanoparticles versus Chitosan Oleate Self-Assembled Polymeric Micelles, Loaded with Resveratrol23citations
  • 2017Effects of welding parameters on strength and corrosion behavior of dissimilar galvanized Q&P and TRIP spot welds9citations
  • 2013Thermal analysis of submicron nanocrystalline diamond films20citations
  • 2010Compatibility between cataphoretic electrocoating and silane surface layer for the corrosion protection of galvanized steelcitations
  • 2009Compatibility between cataphoretic electrocoating and silane surface layer for the corrosion protection of galvanised steelcitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Mäntynen, Pilvi
2 / 2 shared
Sarfraz, Sonia
2 / 2 shared
Kaakinen, M.
3 / 3 shared
Reunanen, J.
3 / 3 shared
Laurila, M.
3 / 3 shared
Leikola, J.
3 / 3 shared
Suojanen, Juho
2 / 4 shared
Mäntynen, P.-H.
1 / 1 shared
Suojanen, J.
1 / 1 shared
Sarfraz, S.
1 / 4 shared
Saarnio, J.
1 / 1 shared
Horelli, J.
1 / 1 shared
Selleri, S.
2 / 6 shared
Bergonzi, L.
2 / 2 shared
Foresti, R.
2 / 2 shared
M., Macaluso G.
2 / 3 shared
Macaluso, C.
2 / 2 shared
Vincenti, V.
1 / 1 shared
Delmonte, N.
1 / 6 shared
Tarabella, G.
1 / 2 shared
Vurro, D.
1 / 2 shared
V., Zeppelin D.
1 / 1 shared
Attolino, S.
1 / 1 shared
Zappettini, A.
1 / 7 shared
Iannotta, S.
1 / 4 shared
G., Maggio M.
1 / 1 shared
Vettori, M.
1 / 3 shared
Costantino, C.
1 / 1 shared
Miragoli, M.
1 / 1 shared
Ghezzi, B.
1 / 3 shared
Rossi, D.
1 / 5 shared
Realdon, N.
1 / 1 shared
Dolmella, A.
1 / 1 shared
Dobrzynski, D.
1 / 1 shared
Sandri, G.
1 / 1 shared
Ferrari, F.
1 / 12 shared
Malavasi, L.
1 / 18 shared
C., Bonferoni M.
1 / 1 shared
Catenacci, L.
1 / 2 shared
Sorrenti, M.
1 / 2 shared
Dacarro, G.
1 / 1 shared
Miele, D.
1 / 1 shared
Russo Spena, P.
1 / 18 shared
Wurzer, R.
1 / 1 shared
Pogany, D.
1 / 2 shared
Kohn, E.
1 / 1 shared
Weaver, J. M. R.
1 / 1 shared
Bychikhin, S.
1 / 1 shared
Alomari, M.
1 / 1 shared
Zhang, Y.
1 / 149 shared
Fedel, M.
2 / 13 shared
Olivier, Marie-Georges
2 / 140 shared
Poelman, Mireille
2 / 22 shared
Deflorian, F.
2 / 9 shared
Druart, Marie-Eve
2 / 26 shared
Chart of publication period
2022
2021
2020
2019
2017
2013
2010
2009

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Mäntynen, Pilvi
  • Sarfraz, Sonia
  • Kaakinen, M.
  • Reunanen, J.
  • Laurila, M.
  • Leikola, J.
  • Suojanen, Juho
  • Mäntynen, P.-H.
  • Suojanen, J.
  • Sarfraz, S.
  • Saarnio, J.
  • Horelli, J.
  • Selleri, S.
  • Bergonzi, L.
  • Foresti, R.
  • M., Macaluso G.
  • Macaluso, C.
  • Vincenti, V.
  • Delmonte, N.
  • Tarabella, G.
  • Vurro, D.
  • V., Zeppelin D.
  • Attolino, S.
  • Zappettini, A.
  • Iannotta, S.
  • G., Maggio M.
  • Vettori, M.
  • Costantino, C.
  • Miragoli, M.
  • Ghezzi, B.
  • Rossi, D.
  • Realdon, N.
  • Dolmella, A.
  • Dobrzynski, D.
  • Sandri, G.
  • Ferrari, F.
  • Malavasi, L.
  • C., Bonferoni M.
  • Catenacci, L.
  • Sorrenti, M.
  • Dacarro, G.
  • Miele, D.
  • Russo Spena, P.
  • Wurzer, R.
  • Pogany, D.
  • Kohn, E.
  • Weaver, J. M. R.
  • Bychikhin, S.
  • Alomari, M.
  • Zhang, Y.
  • Fedel, M.
  • Olivier, Marie-Georges
  • Poelman, Mireille
  • Deflorian, F.
  • Druart, Marie-Eve
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Effect of Surface Tooling Techniques of Medical Titanium Implants on Bacterial Biofilm Formation In Vitro.

  • Mäntynen, Pilvi
  • Saarnio, J.
  • Horelli, J.
  • Sarfraz, Sonia
  • Kaakinen, M.
  • Reunanen, J.
  • Laurila, M.
  • Leikola, J.
  • Suojanen, Juho
  • Rossi, S.
Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the biofilm formation of <i>Streptococcus mutans</i>, <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>, <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i>, and <i>Escherichia coli</i> on titanium implants with CAD-CAM tooling techniques. Twenty specimens of titanium were studied: Titanium grade 2 tooled with a Planmeca CAD-CAM milling device (<i>TiGrade 2</i>), Ti<sub>6</sub>Al<sub>4</sub>V grade 5 as it comes from CAD-DMLS device (computer aided design-direct metal laser sintering device) (<i>TiGrade 5</i>), Ti<sub>6</sub>Al<sub>4</sub>V grade 23 as it comes from a CAD-CAM milling device (<i>TiGrade 23</i>), and CAD-DMLS TiGrade 5 polished with an abrasive disc (<i>TiGrade 5 polished</i>). Bacterial adhesion on the implants was completed with and without saliva treatment to mimic both extraoral and intraoral surgical methods of implant placement. Five specimens/implant types were used in the bacterial adhesion experiments. Autoclaved implant specimens were placed in petri plates and immersed in saliva solution for 30 min at room temperature and then washed 3× with 1× PBS. Bacterial suspensions of each strain were made and added to the specimens after saliva treatment. Biofilm was allowed to form for 24 h at 37 °C and the adhered bacteria was calculated. Tooling techniques had an insignificant effect on the bacterial adhesion by all the bacterial strains studied. However, there was a significant difference in biofilm formation between the saliva-treated and non-saliva-treated implants. Saliva contamination enhanced <i>S. mutans</i>, <i>S. aureus</i>, and <i>E. faecalis</i> adhesion in all material types studied. <i>S. aureus</i> was found to be the most adherent strain in the saliva-treated group, whereas <i>E. coli</i> was the most adherent strain in the non-saliva-treated group. In conclusion, CAD-CAM tooling techniques have little effect on bacterial adhesion. Saliva coating enhances the biofilm formation; therefore, saliva contamination of the implant must be minimized during implant placement. Further extensive studies are needed to evaluate the effects of surface treatments of the titanium implant on soft tissue response and to prevent the factors causing implant infection and failure.

Topics
  • surface
  • experiment
  • grinding
  • milling
  • titanium
  • sintering
  • laser sintering
  • collision-induced dissociation