Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Mcgarrigle, Cormac

  • Google
  • 11
  • 26
  • 169

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (11/11 displayed)

  • 2022Influence of extrusion parameters on filled polyphenylsulfone tufting yarns on open-hole tensile strength1citations
  • 2022Characterization of continuous carbon fibre reinforced 3D printed polymer composites with varying fibre volume fractions94citations
  • 2022Elastic Modulus and Flatwise (Through-Thickness) Tensile Strength of Continuous Carbon Fibre Reinforced 3D Printed Polymer Composites3citations
  • 2021Comparison of Properties and Bead Geometry in MIG and CMT Single Layer Samples for WAAM Applications19citations
  • 2021Influence of Binder Float Length on the Out-of-Plane and Axial Impact Performance of 3D Woven Composites14citations
  • 2021Thread-stripping test procedures leading to factors of safety data for friction-drilled holes in thin-section aluminium alloy11citations
  • 2020Improved crush energy absorption in 3D woven composites by pick density modification25citations
  • 2019Influence of Textile Architecture on the Mechanical Properties of 3D Woven Carbon Compositescitations
  • 2019Comparative studies of structure property relationship between glass/epoxy and carbon/epoxy 3D woven compositescitations
  • 2019Energy Absorption Mechanisms in Layer-to-Layer 3D Woven Compositescitations
  • 2019Improved Energy Absorption in 3D Woven Composites by Weave Parameter Manipulation2citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Wegrzyn, Marcin
1 / 3 shared
Harkin-Jones, Eileen
8 / 46 shared
Archer, Edward
8 / 15 shared
Mcilhagger, Alistair
8 / 18 shared
Han, Yisong
1 / 17 shared
Dixon, Dorian
1 / 3 shared
Shar, Muhammad Ali
1 / 4 shared
Mcmillan, Alison
1 / 4 shared
Saeed, Khalid
1 / 3 shared
Quinn, Justin
3 / 10 shared
Ward, Richard
2 / 2 shared
Stinson, Harley
1 / 1 shared
Dahale, Monali
6 / 8 shared
Ralph, Calvin
1 / 1 shared
Kelly, John
6 / 10 shared
Toso, Nathalie
3 / 6 shared
Ramaswamy, Karthik
1 / 1 shared
Mccarthy, Michael
1 / 1 shared
Yoo, Sanghyun
3 / 6 shared
Neale, Geoffrey
6 / 10 shared
Wu, Hao
1 / 21 shared
Clarke, Ryan
1 / 1 shared
Porter, Mark
1 / 1 shared
Mcfadden, Shaun
1 / 37 shared
Yoo, S.
1 / 25 shared
Toso, N.
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2022
2021
2020
2019

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Wegrzyn, Marcin
  • Harkin-Jones, Eileen
  • Archer, Edward
  • Mcilhagger, Alistair
  • Han, Yisong
  • Dixon, Dorian
  • Shar, Muhammad Ali
  • Mcmillan, Alison
  • Saeed, Khalid
  • Quinn, Justin
  • Ward, Richard
  • Stinson, Harley
  • Dahale, Monali
  • Ralph, Calvin
  • Kelly, John
  • Toso, Nathalie
  • Ramaswamy, Karthik
  • Mccarthy, Michael
  • Yoo, Sanghyun
  • Neale, Geoffrey
  • Wu, Hao
  • Clarke, Ryan
  • Porter, Mark
  • Mcfadden, Shaun
  • Yoo, S.
  • Toso, N.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Elastic Modulus and Flatwise (Through-Thickness) Tensile Strength of Continuous Carbon Fibre Reinforced 3D Printed Polymer Composites

  • Mcgarrigle, Cormac
Abstract

<jats:p>Additively manufactured composite specimens exhibit anisotropic properties, meaning that the elastic response changes with respect to orientation. Both in-plane and out-of-plane mechanical properties are important for designing purpose. Recent studies have characterised the in-plane performance. In this study, however, through-thickness tensile strength of 3D polymer composites were determined by printing of continuous carbon fibre reinforced thermoplastic polyamide-based composite, manufactured using a Markforged Two 3D printer. This paper discusses sample fabrication and geometry, adhesive used, and testing procedure. Test standards used to determine out-of-plane properties are tedious as most of the premature failures occur between the specimens and the tabs. Two types of samples were printed according to ASTM flatwise tension standard and the results were compared to determine the geometry effect on the interlaminar strength. This test method consists of subjecting the printed sample to a uniaxial tensile force normal to the plane. With this method, the acceptable failure modes for tensile strength must be internal to the structure, not between the sample and the end tabs. Micro-computed tomography (µCT) was carried out to observe the porosity. Surface behaviour was studied using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to see the voids and the distribution of the fibres in the samples. The results showed consistent values for tensile strength and elastic modulus for Araldite glue after initial trials (with some other adhesives) to determine a suitable choice of adhesive for bonding the samples with the tabs. Circular specimens have higher tensile strength and elastic modulus as compared to rectangular specimens.</jats:p>

Topics
  • surface
  • Carbon
  • scanning electron microscopy
  • tomography
  • strength
  • anisotropic
  • composite
  • tensile strength
  • void
  • porosity
  • thermoplastic