People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Åkerfeldt, Pia
Luleå University of Technology
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (21/21 displayed)
- 2024Microstructure and mechanical properties of a modified 316 austenitic stainless steel alloy manufactured by laser powder bed fusioncitations
- 2024Machining of additively manufactured alloy 718 in as-built and heat-treated condition: surface integrity and cutting tool wearcitations
- 2024Machining of additively manufactured alloy 718 in as-built and heat-treated condition : surface integrity and cutting tool wearcitations
- 2024Machining of additively manufactured alloy 718 in as-built and heat-treated condition : surface integrity and cutting tool wearcitations
- 2024Prediction of manufacturing parameters of additively manufactured 316L steel samples using ultrasound fingerprintingcitations
- 2023Estimating manufacturing parameters of additively manufactured 316L steel cubes using ultrasound fingerprinting
- 2023Microstructural characterization and mechanical properties of additively manufactured 21-6-9 stainless steel for aerospace applicationscitations
- 2023Stress relief heat treatment and mechanical properties of laser powder bed fusion built 21-6-9 stainless steelcitations
- 2023Machining of additively manufactured alloy 718 in as-built and heat-treated condition : surface integrity and cutting tool wearcitations
- 2021Defects in Electron Beam Melted Ti-6Al-4V: Fatigue Life Prediction Using Experimental Data and Extreme Value Statisticscitations
- 2021Springback prediction and validation in hot forming of a double-curved component in alloy 718citations
- 2021Microstructural Characterization and Mechanical Properties of L-PBF Processed 316 L at Cryogenic Temperaturecitations
- 2020Fatigue crack growth of electron beam melted TI-6AL-4V in high-pressure hydrogencitations
- 2020Texture of electron beam melted Ti-6Al-4V measured with neutron diffractioncitations
- 2019Temperature and Microstructure Evolution in Gas Tungsten Arc Welding Wire Feed Additive Manufacturing of Ti-6Al-4Vcitations
- 2019Temperature and microstructure evolution in Gas Tungsten Arc Welding wire feed additive manufacturing of Ti-6Al-4Vcitations
- 2018Defect characterization of electron beam melted Ti-6Al-4V and Alloy 718 with X-ray microtomographycitations
- 2018Influence of successive thermal cycling on microstructure evolution of EBM-manufactured alloy 718 in track-by-track and layer-by-layer designcitations
- 2016Additive Manufacturing of Ti-6Al-4V: Relationship between Microstructure, Defects and Mechanical Properties
- 2012Investigation of the influence of copper welding electrodes on Ti-8Al-1Mo-1V and Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-2Mo with respect to solid metal induced embrittlementcitations
- 2012Solid metal induced embrittlement of titanium alloys
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
Microstructural Characterization and Mechanical Properties of L-PBF Processed 316 L at Cryogenic Temperature
Abstract
<jats:p>Laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF) has attracted great interest in the aerospace and medical sectors because it can produce complex and lightweight parts with high accuracy. Austenitic stainless steel alloy 316 L is widely used in many applications due to its good mechanical properties and high corrosion resistance over a wide temperature range. In this study, L-PBF-processed 316 L was investigated for its suitability in aerospace applications at cryogenic service temperatures and the behavior at cryogenic temperature was compared with room temperature to understand the properties and microstructural changes within this temperature range. Tensile tests were performed at room temperature and at −196 °C to study the mechanical performance and phase changes. The microstructure and fracture surfaces were characterized using scanning electron microscopy, and the phases were analyzed by X-ray diffraction. The results showed a significant increase in the strength of 316 L at −196 °C, while its ductility remained at an acceptable level. The results indicated the formation of ε and α martensite during cryogenic testing, which explained the increase in strength. Nanoindentation revealed different hardness values, indicating the different mechanical properties of austenite (γ), strained austenite, body-centered cubic martensite (α), and hexagonal close-packed martensite (ε) formed during the tensile tests due to mechanical deformation.</jats:p>