Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Şimăndan, Iosif - Daniel

  • Google
  • 6
  • 21
  • 90

National Institute of Materials Physics

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (6/6 displayed)

  • 2021Structural and optical properties of amorphous Si–Ge–Te thin films prepared by combinatorial sputtering16citations
  • 2021Synthesis and Characterization of Cu2ZnSnS4 Thin Films Obtained by Combined Magnetron Sputtering and Pulsed Laser Deposition17citations
  • 2021Influence of Deposition Method on the Structural and Optical Properties of Ge2Sb2Te513citations
  • 2021The Effect of the Deposition Method on the Structural and Optical Properties of ZnS Thin Films26citations
  • 2020Secondary Crystalline Phases Influence on Optical Properties in Off-Stoichiometric Cu2S–ZnS–SnS2 Thin Films17citations
  • 2014Simulation of the structure of GeAs<sub>4</sub>Te<sub>7</sub> chalcogenide materials during memory switching1citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Mihai, C.
1 / 1 shared
Galca, A. C.
1 / 6 shared
Sava, F.
2 / 2 shared
Becherescu, N.
1 / 1 shared
Burducea, I.
1 / 3 shared
Velea, A.
2 / 3 shared
Sava, Florinel
4 / 7 shared
Mihai, Claudia
4 / 7 shared
Velea, Alin
4 / 7 shared
Buruiană, Angel-Theodor
1 / 3 shared
Zaki, Mohamed Yassine
1 / 2 shared
Galca, Aurelian Catalin
4 / 11 shared
Becherescu, Nicu
4 / 5 shared
Burducea, Ion
2 / 2 shared
Buruiana, Angel-Theodor
2 / 3 shared
Matei, Elena
1 / 5 shared
Diagne, Ousmane
1 / 1 shared
Becherescu, Virginia
1 / 1 shared
Burdusel, Mihail
1 / 4 shared
Popescu, M.
1 / 1 shared
Lőrinczi, A.
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2021
2020
2014

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Mihai, C.
  • Galca, A. C.
  • Sava, F.
  • Becherescu, N.
  • Burducea, I.
  • Velea, A.
  • Sava, Florinel
  • Mihai, Claudia
  • Velea, Alin
  • Buruiană, Angel-Theodor
  • Zaki, Mohamed Yassine
  • Galca, Aurelian Catalin
  • Becherescu, Nicu
  • Burducea, Ion
  • Buruiana, Angel-Theodor
  • Matei, Elena
  • Diagne, Ousmane
  • Becherescu, Virginia
  • Burdusel, Mihail
  • Popescu, M.
  • Lőrinczi, A.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Influence of Deposition Method on the Structural and Optical Properties of Ge2Sb2Te5

  • Şimăndan, Iosif - Daniel
  • Burducea, Ion
  • Buruiana, Angel-Theodor
  • Sava, Florinel
  • Mihai, Claudia
  • Velea, Alin
  • Galca, Aurelian Catalin
  • Becherescu, Nicu
Abstract

<jats:p>Ge2Sb2Te5 (GST-225) is a chalcogenide material with applications in nonvolatile memories. However, chalcogenide material properties are dependent on the deposition technique. GST-225 thin films were prepared using three deposition methods: magnetron sputtering (MS), pulsed laser deposition (PLD) and a deposition technique that combines MS and PLD, namely MSPLD. In the MSPLD technique, the same bulk target is used for sputtering but also for PLD at the same time. The structural and optical properties of the as-deposited and annealed thin films were characterized by Rutherford backscattering spectrometry, X-ray reflectometry, X-ray diffraction, Raman spectroscopy and spectroscopic ellipsometry. MS has the advantage of easily leading to fully amorphous films and to a single crystalline phase after annealing. MS also produces the highest optical contrast between the as-deposited and annealed films. PLD leads to the best stoichiometric transfer, whereas the annealed MSPLD films have the highest mass density. All the as-deposited films obtained with the three methods have a similar optical bandgap of approximately 0.7 eV, which decreases after annealing, mostly in the case of the MS sample. This study reveals that the properties of GST-225 are significantly influenced by the deposition technique, and the proper method should be selected when targeting a specific application. In particular, for electrical and optical phase change memories, MS is the best suited deposition method.</jats:p>

Topics
  • density
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • amorphous
  • x-ray diffraction
  • thin film
  • crystalline phase
  • mass spectrometry
  • ellipsometry
  • annealing
  • pulsed laser deposition
  • Raman spectroscopy
  • spectrometry
  • Rutherford backscattering spectrometry
  • reflectometry