Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Seca, Ricardo

  • Google
  • 2
  • 5
  • 10

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2022Tensile Properties of As-Built 18Ni300 Maraging Steel Produced by DED5citations
  • 2021Analysis of EDM Performance, through a Thermal–Electrical Model with a Trunk-Conical Discharge Channel, Using a Steel Tool and an Aluminium Workpiece5citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Gil, Jorge
1 / 1 shared
Amaral, Rui
1 / 2 shared
Reis, Ana
1 / 15 shared
Emadinia, Omid
1 / 5 shared
De Jesus, Abílio M. P.
1 / 12 shared
Chart of publication period
2022
2021

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Gil, Jorge
  • Amaral, Rui
  • Reis, Ana
  • Emadinia, Omid
  • De Jesus, Abílio M. P.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Analysis of EDM Performance, through a Thermal–Electrical Model with a Trunk-Conical Discharge Channel, Using a Steel Tool and an Aluminium Workpiece

  • Seca, Ricardo
Abstract

<jats:p>In this article, a finite element (FE) thermal–electrical model with a trunk-conical discharge channel is employed to simulate individual EDM discharges with a time-on of 18 μs up to 320 μs, which are subsequently compared with the experimental results to validate the model. The discharge channel is a trunk-conical electrical conductor which dissipates heat by the Joule heating effect, being the correspondent factor equal to 1. Instead of the usual copper–iron electrode combination, steel (DIN CK45) and aluminium alloys (DIN 3.4365) are the implemented materials on both the tool and the workpiece, respectively. The numerical results were measured using the melting temperature of the materials as the boundary of material removal. The results obtained with the thermal–electrical model, namely the tool wear ratio, the tool wear rate, the material removal rate, and the surface roughness, are in good agreement with experimental results, showing that the new FE model is capable of predicting accurately with different materials for the electrodes.</jats:p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • aluminium
  • steel
  • aluminium alloy
  • copper
  • iron
  • melting temperature