Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Ferreira, Afonso Pinhão

  • Google
  • 2
  • 12
  • 29

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2020Bond strength of metallic or ceramic orthodontic brackets to enamel, acrylic, or porcelain surfaces29citations
  • 2017Damage on tooth enamel after removal of orthodontic adhesive by Arkansas' stone and tungsten carbide burscitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Henriques, Bruno
2 / 64 shared
Carvalho, Óscar
1 / 10 shared
Matias De Souza, Júlio César
2 / 75 shared
Pinho, Mónica
1 / 1 shared
Manso, Maria C.
1 / 1 shared
Silva, Filipe
1 / 19 shared
Almeida, Ricardo Faria
1 / 1 shared
Martin, Conchita
1 / 1 shared
Mesquita, Pedro
1 / 3 shared
Silva, Filipe S.
1 / 36 shared
Pinto, Gustavo F. V.
1 / 1 shared
Pinho, Mónica Morado
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2020
2017

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Henriques, Bruno
  • Carvalho, Óscar
  • Matias De Souza, Júlio César
  • Pinho, Mónica
  • Manso, Maria C.
  • Silva, Filipe
  • Almeida, Ricardo Faria
  • Martin, Conchita
  • Mesquita, Pedro
  • Silva, Filipe S.
  • Pinto, Gustavo F. V.
  • Pinho, Mónica Morado
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Bond strength of metallic or ceramic orthodontic brackets to enamel, acrylic, or porcelain surfaces

  • Henriques, Bruno
  • Carvalho, Óscar
  • Ferreira, Afonso Pinhão
  • Matias De Souza, Júlio César
  • Pinho, Mónica
  • Manso, Maria C.
  • Silva, Filipe
  • Almeida, Ricardo Faria
  • Martin, Conchita
Abstract

<p>Bonding strategies within different brackets and dental materials are still a challenge concerning adhesion and dental surface damage. This study compared the shear and tensile bond strength of orthodontic ceramic and metallic brackets to enamel, acrylic, and ceramic surfaces after thermal cycling. Dental surfaces were divided into three groups: enamel, ceramic, and acrylic. Each group received stainless-steel and ceramic brackets. After thermal cycling, specimens were randomly divided into two subgroups considering tensile (TBS) or shear bond strength (SBS) test. After the mechanical testing, scanning electron and optical microscopy were performed, and the adhesive remnant index (ARI) was determined. The two-way ANOVA full factorial design was used to compare TBS, SBS, and ARI on the surface and bracket type (α = 0.05). There were significant differences in TBS, SBS, and ARI values per surface (p &lt; 0.001 and p = 0.009) and type of bracket (p = 0.025 and p = 0.001). The highest mean SBS values were recorded for a ceramic bracket bonded to an acrylic surface (8.4 ± 2.3 MPa). For TBS, a ceramic bracket bonded to acrylic showed the worst performance (5.2 ± 1.8 MPa) and the highest values were found on a metallic bracket bonded to enamel. The adhesion of metallic or ceramic brackets is enough for clinical practice although the damage of the enamel surface after debonding is irreversible and harmful for the aesthetic outcome of the teeth.</p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • strength
  • steel
  • ceramic
  • optical microscopy