Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Lacoste, Eric

  • Google
  • 13
  • 29
  • 126

Institut de Mathématiques de Marseille

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (13/13 displayed)

  • 2022Microstructural and mechanical aspects of AlSi7Mg0.6 alloy related to scanning strategies in L-PBF11citations
  • 2022High Strain Rate Deformation Behavior and Recrystallization of Alloy 718citations
  • 2021High Strain Rate Deformation Behavior and Recrystallization of Alloy 71812citations
  • 2020Relative Density of SLM-Produced Aluminum Alloy Parts: Interpretation of Results28citations
  • 2020Inline drift detection using monitoring systems and machine learning in selective laser melting35citations
  • 2019Pieces of increasing technical performance manufactured with recycled carbon fibers for competitive boatingcitations
  • 2019Analytical modeling of hot behavior of Ti-6Al-4V alloy at large straincitations
  • 2019Analytical modeling of hot behavior of Ti-6Al-4V alloy at large strain16citations
  • 2018Genesis of Microstructures in Friction Stir Welding of Ti-6Al-4V12citations
  • 2018Genesis of Microstructures in Friction Stir Welding of Ti-6Al-4Vcitations
  • 2010Control of Inconel 738LC superalloy microstructure with the aid of a precipitate dissolution semi-analytical modeling5citations
  • 2009Numerical simulation of segregation phenomena coupled with phase change and fluid flow : application to metal matrix composites processing4citations
  • 2008A new procedure of statistical approach characterization of ceramic filament fracture strength by bending tests3citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Rigo, Olivier
2 / 9 shared
Yadav, Pinku
2 / 2 shared
Arvieu, Corinne
5 / 6 shared
Lindgren, Lars-Erik
2 / 14 shared
Åkerström, Paul
2 / 10 shared
Jacquin, Dimitri
6 / 8 shared
Moretti, Marie Anna
2 / 7 shared
Dalai, Biswajit
2 / 9 shared
Galy, Cassiopée
1 / 2 shared
Guen, Emilie Le
1 / 3 shared
Le Guen, Emilie
1 / 3 shared
Singh, Vibhutesh Kumar
1 / 1 shared
Joffre, Thomas
1 / 3 shared
Gillet, Arnaud
1 / 2 shared
Cazaurang, Gilles
1 / 1 shared
Mantaux, Olivier
2 / 6 shared
Aldanondo, Egoitz
2 / 6 shared
Tchein, Gnofam Jacques
4 / 4 shared
Girot Mata, Franck
2 / 2 shared
Coupard, Dominique
4 / 12 shared
Gutierrez-Orrantia, Esther
2 / 2 shared
Girot, Franck
2 / 11 shared
Danis, Yann
1 / 2 shared
Arvieu, Corine
3 / 9 shared
Quenisset, Jean-Michel
2 / 9 shared
Danis, Michel
1 / 1 shared
Cantarel, Arthur
1 / 32 shared
Segarra, M.
1 / 4 shared
Spataro, D.
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2010
2009
2008

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Rigo, Olivier
  • Yadav, Pinku
  • Arvieu, Corinne
  • Lindgren, Lars-Erik
  • Åkerström, Paul
  • Jacquin, Dimitri
  • Moretti, Marie Anna
  • Dalai, Biswajit
  • Galy, Cassiopée
  • Guen, Emilie Le
  • Le Guen, Emilie
  • Singh, Vibhutesh Kumar
  • Joffre, Thomas
  • Gillet, Arnaud
  • Cazaurang, Gilles
  • Mantaux, Olivier
  • Aldanondo, Egoitz
  • Tchein, Gnofam Jacques
  • Girot Mata, Franck
  • Coupard, Dominique
  • Gutierrez-Orrantia, Esther
  • Girot, Franck
  • Danis, Yann
  • Arvieu, Corine
  • Quenisset, Jean-Michel
  • Danis, Michel
  • Cantarel, Arthur
  • Segarra, M.
  • Spataro, D.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Relative Density of SLM-Produced Aluminum Alloy Parts: Interpretation of Results

  • Galy, Cassiopée
  • Guen, Emilie Le
  • Lacoste, Eric
  • Arvieu, Corinne
Abstract

<jats:p>Micrographic image analysis, tomography and the Archimedes method are commonly used to analyze the porosity of Selective Laser Melting (SLM)-produced parts and then to estimate the relative density. This article deals with the limitation of the relative density results to conclude on the quality of a part manufactured by additive manufacturing and focuses on the interpretation of the relative density result. To achieve this aim, two experimental methods are used: the image analysis method, which provides local information on the distribution of porosity, and the Archimedes method, which provides access to global information. To investigate this, two different grades of aluminum alloy, AlSi7Mg0.6 and AM205, were used in this study. The study concludes that an analysis of the metallographic images to calculate the relative density of the part depends on the areas chosen for the analysis. In addition, the results show that the Archimedes method has limitations, particularly related to the choice of reference materials for calculating relative density. It can be observed, for example, that, depending on the experimental conditions, the calculation can lead to relative densities higher than 100%, which is inconsistent. This article shows that it is essential that a result of relative density obtained from Archimedes measurements be supplemented by an indication of the reference density used.</jats:p>

Topics
  • density
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • tomography
  • aluminium
  • selective laser melting
  • porosity