Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Justham, Laura

  • Google
  • 1
  • 2
  • 4

Loughborough University

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2024Hardness Classification Using Cost-Effective Off-the-Shelf Tactile Sensors Inspired by Mechanoreceptors4citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Ferreira, Pedro
1 / 2 shared
Sharma, Yash
1 / 2 shared
Chart of publication period
2024

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Ferreira, Pedro
  • Sharma, Yash
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Hardness Classification Using Cost-Effective Off-the-Shelf Tactile Sensors Inspired by Mechanoreceptors

  • Ferreira, Pedro
  • Justham, Laura
  • Sharma, Yash
Abstract

<jats:p>Perception is essential for robotic systems, enabling effective interaction with their surroundings through actions such as grasping and touching. Traditionally, this has relied on integrating various sensor systems, including tactile sensors, cameras, and acoustic sensors. This study leverages commercially available tactile sensors for hardness classification, drawing inspiration from the functionality of human mechanoreceptors in recognizing complex object properties during grasping tasks. Unlike previous research using customized sensors, this study focuses on cost-effective, easy-to-install, and readily deployable sensors. The approach employs a qualitative method, using Shore hardness taxonomy to select objects and evaluate the performance of commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) sensors. The analysis includes data from both individual sensors and their combinations analysed using multiple machine learning approaches, and accuracy as the primary evaluation metric was considered. The findings illustrate that increasing the number of classification classes impacts accuracy, achieving 92% in binary classification, 82% in ternary, and 80% in quaternary scenarios. Notably, the performance of commercially available tactile sensors is comparable to those reported in the literature, which range from 50% to 98% accuracy, achieving 92% accuracy with a limited data set. These results highlight the capability of COTS tactile sensors in hardness classification giving accuracy levels of 92%, while being cost-effective and easier to deploy than customized tactile sensors.</jats:p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • drawing
  • machine learning
  • shore hardness