Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Touileb, Kamal

  • Google
  • 1
  • 4
  • 3

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2023Particle Swarm Method for Optimization of ATIG Welding Process to Joint Mild Steel to 316L Stainless Steel3citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Hedhibi, Abdeljlil Chihaoui
1 / 3 shared
Boubaker, Sahbi
1 / 1 shared
Djoudjou, Rachid
1 / 3 shared
Ouis, Abousoufiane
1 / 3 shared
Chart of publication period
2023

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Hedhibi, Abdeljlil Chihaoui
  • Boubaker, Sahbi
  • Djoudjou, Rachid
  • Ouis, Abousoufiane
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Particle Swarm Method for Optimization of ATIG Welding Process to Joint Mild Steel to 316L Stainless Steel

  • Hedhibi, Abdeljlil Chihaoui
  • Boubaker, Sahbi
  • Djoudjou, Rachid
  • Ouis, Abousoufiane
  • Touileb, Kamal
Abstract

<jats:p>316L stainless steel joined to mild steel is widespread in several applications to reach a requested good association of mechanical properties at a lower cost. The activating tungsten inert gas (ATIG) weld was carried out using a modified flux composed of 76.63% SiO2 + 13.37% Cr2O3 + 10% NaF to meet standard recommendations in terms of limiting the root penetration. Modified optimal flux gave a depth of penetration 1.84 times greater than that of conventional tungsten inert gas (TIG) welds and a root penetration of up to 0.8 mm. The microstructure of the dissimilar joints was investigated using a scanning electron microscope and EDS analysis. The mechanical properties of the weld were not affected by the modified flux. The results show that the energy absorbed in the fusion zone in the case of ATIG weld (239 J/cm2) is greater than that of TIG weld (216 J/cm2). It was found that the weld bead obtained with the optimal flux combination in ATIG welding can better withstand sudden loads. The obtained UTS value (377 MPa) for ATIG welding was close to that of TIG welding (376 MPa). The average Vickers hardness readings for ATIG welds in the fusion zone are up to 277 HV, compared to 252 HV for conventional TIG welding.</jats:p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • microstructure
  • stainless steel
  • hardness
  • Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy
  • tungsten