Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Leeuwen, Nina Storm Van

  • Google
  • 1
  • 4
  • 0

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2024Effect of Glazing Protocol on the Surface Roughness and Optical Properties of Lithia-Based Glass-Ceramicscitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Jpm, Tribst
1 / 88 shared
Rosa, Lucas Saldanha Da
1 / 13 shared
Kleverlaan, Cornelis Johannes
1 / 105 shared
Dal Piva, Amanda
1 / 41 shared
Chart of publication period
2024

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Jpm, Tribst
  • Rosa, Lucas Saldanha Da
  • Kleverlaan, Cornelis Johannes
  • Dal Piva, Amanda
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Effect of Glazing Protocol on the Surface Roughness and Optical Properties of Lithia-Based Glass-Ceramics

  • Jpm, Tribst
  • Rosa, Lucas Saldanha Da
  • Leeuwen, Nina Storm Van
  • Kleverlaan, Cornelis Johannes
  • Dal Piva, Amanda
Abstract

<p>Background: New lithia-based glass–ceramics, including Advanced Lithium Disilicate (ALD), have become popular in dentistry. However, it is unclear if glazing protocols for ALD might compromise its surface or optical properties. Thus, evaluating color and translucency changes in ALD and traditional lithium disilicate (LD) is crucial. Methods: This study aimed to assess how different firing protocols affect the surface and optical properties of LD and ALD. Sixty disc-shaped specimens were prepared, divided into three subgroups based on firing protocols, and subjected to surface roughness analysis. Specimens were immersed in coffee, wine, and water for 7 days, and then brushed. Color and translucency were measured. Results: Firing protocols significantly influenced surface roughness in LD (0.09–1.39 µm) and ALD (0.05–0.88 µm). Color differences were observed in both LD and ALD after 7 days, with visible changes within clinically acceptable thresholds. Translucency remained stable across firing protocols and staining liquids. Conclusions: Varying firing protocols impact surface roughness and color stability in LD and ALD. Despite differences, color and translucency changes remained within acceptable clinical thresholds, suggesting both materials are suitable for dental applications. Therefore, this study reinforces the reliability and versatility of these materials in restorative dentistry.</p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • glass
  • glass
  • Lithium
  • ceramic