Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Molaei, Reza

  • Google
  • 1
  • 5
  • 5

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2024The Effect of Laser Shock Peening (LSP) on the Surface Roughness and Fatigue Behavior of Additively Manufactured Ti-6Al-4V Alloy5citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Ghadar, Samira
1 / 1 shared
Dyer, Krista
1 / 1 shared
Zulić, Sanin
1 / 3 shared
Rostohar, Danijela
1 / 7 shared
Asadi, Ebrahim
1 / 2 shared
Chart of publication period
2024

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Ghadar, Samira
  • Dyer, Krista
  • Zulić, Sanin
  • Rostohar, Danijela
  • Asadi, Ebrahim
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

The Effect of Laser Shock Peening (LSP) on the Surface Roughness and Fatigue Behavior of Additively Manufactured Ti-6Al-4V Alloy

  • Ghadar, Samira
  • Dyer, Krista
  • Zulić, Sanin
  • Rostohar, Danijela
  • Molaei, Reza
  • Asadi, Ebrahim
Abstract

Laser shock peening (LSP) uses plasma shock waves to induce compressive residual stress at the surface of a component which has the potential to improve its fatigue properties. For AM parts, the existence of internal defects, surface roughness, and tensile residual stresses leads to noticeably lower fatigue strength compared to materials produced through conventional processes. Furthermore, there is a tendency for greater scatter in the fatigue behavior of these parts when compared to traditionally manufactured components. In this study, the effect of LSP on the roughness and fatigue behavior of Ti-6Al-4V alloy constructed through Laser Powder Bed Fusion (L-PBF) technique was investigated. Two types of samples were designed and tested: as-built surface air foil samples for four-point bending tests and machined surface straight gage samples for uniaxial fatigue testing. Two sets of process parameters, optimized and non-optimized, were also used for the fabrication of each sample type. It was found that LSP had negative effects on the smooth (i.e., machined) surface samples, whereas for as-built surfaces the roughness was enhanced by decreasing the sharpness of the deep valleys and partially remelting the loosely bonded particles on the peaks. It was found that the scatter of the fatigue data decreased for optimized machined samples, while no clear improvement was observed in their lives. However, all non-optimized samples showed improvements in fatigue lives after the LSP process.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • strength
  • fatigue
  • selective laser melting
  • bending flexural test
  • defect
  • fatigue testing