Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Vasconcelos, V.

  • Google
  • 8
  • 31
  • 193

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (8/8 displayed)

  • 2021Unveiling the Antifouling Performance of Different Marine Surfaces and Their Effect on the Development and Structure of Cyanobacterial Biofilms19citations
  • 2021Developing New Marine Antifouling Surfaces: Learning from Single-Strain Laboratory Tests11citations
  • 2021Natural Benzo/Acetophenones as Leads for New Synthetic Acetophenone Hybrids Containing a 1,2,3-Triazole Ring as Potential Antifouling Agents11citations
  • 2020The Relative Importance of Shear Forces and Surface Hydrophobicity on Biofilm Formation by Coccoid Cyanobacteria32citations
  • 2020Characterization of planktonic and biofilm cells from two filamentous cyanobacteria using a shotgun proteomic approach15citations
  • 2020Experimental Assessment of the Performance of Two Marine Coatings to Curb Biofilm Formation of Microfoulers20citations
  • 2019Biofilm formation behaviour of marine filamentous cyanobacterial strains in controlled hydrodynamic conditions39citations
  • 2018Potential of synthetic chalcone derivatives to prevent marine biofouling46citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Teixeira Santos, R.
4 / 8 shared
Sjollema, J.
2 / 3 shared
Faria, Si
4 / 7 shared
De Jong, E.
1 / 4 shared
Romeu, Mj
3 / 8 shared
Morais, J.
6 / 7 shared
Mergulhao, Fj
2 / 9 shared
Mergulhao, Fjm
4 / 6 shared
Gomes, Lc
2 / 11 shared
Correia Da Silva, M.
2 / 3 shared
Pereira, D.
2 / 5 shared
Pinto, M.
2 / 6 shared
Cidade, H.
2 / 2 shared
Cardoso, J.
1 / 3 shared
Neves, Ar
1 / 2 shared
Almeida, Jr
2 / 2 shared
Sousa, E.
1 / 3 shared
Goncalves, C.
1 / 9 shared
Leal Romeu, Mjl
1 / 1 shared
Dominguez Perez, D.
1 / 1 shared
Almeida, D.
1 / 2 shared
Campos, A.
1 / 4 shared
Silva, Er
1 / 4 shared
Ramos, V.
1 / 2 shared
De Jong, Ed
1 / 4 shared
Miranda, Jm
1 / 2 shared
Alves, P.
1 / 7 shared
Antunes, J.
1 / 1 shared
Palmeira, Andreia
1 / 1 shared
Moreira, J.
1 / 2 shared
Pereira, S.
1 / 12 shared
Chart of publication period
2021
2020
2019
2018

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Teixeira Santos, R.
  • Sjollema, J.
  • Faria, Si
  • De Jong, E.
  • Romeu, Mj
  • Morais, J.
  • Mergulhao, Fj
  • Mergulhao, Fjm
  • Gomes, Lc
  • Correia Da Silva, M.
  • Pereira, D.
  • Pinto, M.
  • Cidade, H.
  • Cardoso, J.
  • Neves, Ar
  • Almeida, Jr
  • Sousa, E.
  • Goncalves, C.
  • Leal Romeu, Mjl
  • Dominguez Perez, D.
  • Almeida, D.
  • Campos, A.
  • Silva, Er
  • Ramos, V.
  • De Jong, Ed
  • Miranda, Jm
  • Alves, P.
  • Antunes, J.
  • Palmeira, Andreia
  • Moreira, J.
  • Pereira, S.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Experimental Assessment of the Performance of Two Marine Coatings to Curb Biofilm Formation of Microfoulers

  • Teixeira Santos, R.
  • Faria, Si
  • Mergulhao, Fjm
  • Gomes, Lc
  • Vasconcelos, V.
  • Morais, J.
  • Silva, Er
Abstract

Biofilms formed on submerged marine surfaces play a critical role in the fouling process, causing increased fuel consumption, corrosion, and high maintenance costs. Thus, marine biofouling is a major issue and motivates the development of antifouling coatings. In this study, the performance of two commercial marine coatings, a foul-release silicone-based paint (SilRef) and an epoxy resin (EpoRef), was evaluated regarding their abilities to prevent biofilm formation byCyanobiumsp. andPseudoalteromonas tunicata(common microfoulers). Biofilms were developed under defined hydrodynamic conditions to simulate marine settings, and the number of biofilm cells, wet weight, and thickness were monitored for 7 weeks. The biofilm structure was analyzed by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) at the end-point. Results demonstrated that EpoRef surfaces were effective in inhibiting biofilm formation at initial stages (until day 28), while SilRef surfaces showed high efficacy in decreasing biofilm formation during maturation (from day 35 onwards). Wet weight and thickness analysis, as well as CLSM data, indicate that SilRef surfaces were less prone to biofilm formation than EpoRef surfaces. Furthermore, the efficacy of SilRef surfaces may be dependent on the fouling microorganism, while the performance of EpoRef was strongly influenced by a combined effect of surface and microorganism.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • corrosion
  • laser emission spectroscopy
  • resin
  • confocal laser scanning microscopy