Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Chaves, Igor

  • Google
  • 1
  • 3
  • 1

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2024Impact of the Delay Period between Electrochemical Hydrogen Charging and Tensile Testing on the Mechanical Properties of Mild Steel1citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Allen, Jessica
1 / 1 shared
Lynch, Sam
1 / 2 shared
Richardson, Peter
1 / 3 shared
Chart of publication period
2024

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Allen, Jessica
  • Lynch, Sam
  • Richardson, Peter
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Impact of the Delay Period between Electrochemical Hydrogen Charging and Tensile Testing on the Mechanical Properties of Mild Steel

  • Allen, Jessica
  • Lynch, Sam
  • Richardson, Peter
  • Chaves, Igor
Abstract

<jats:p>With escalating global regulatory pressure for countries to adhere to emission laws, repurposing existing natural gas pipelines for hydrogen-based commodities stands to be an economical solution. However, the effects of hydrogen embrittlement must be thoroughly considered for this application to avoid the unexpected catastrophic failure of these pipelines. The literature proposes several physicochemical embrittlement models. This paper reports one aspect of hydrogen embrittlement that remains to be quantified: the recovery of ductility (embrittlement) of mild steel specimens subjected to artificially accelerated hydrogen absorption via electrochemical charging as a function of time. The effects of charging duration and particularly the delay period between charging and mechanical tensile testing were investigated. Unsurprisingly, longer charging time shows a greater loss of elongation; however, a more extensive recovery of ductility correlated with longer charging time in the first few days after charging. The data also show that while the uncharged mild steel met all minimum required values for strength and elongation for the specified grade, there was a substantial variability in the elongation to failure. The same trends in variability of elongation translated to the hydrogen-charged specimens. Due to this extensive variability, failure to meet the elongation specification of the grade is reported based on the worst-case scenario obtained for a given set of samples for each exposure condition. These results have practical implications for the monitoring and testing of infrastructure exposed to hydrogen, particularly as this relates to industry planned operational shutdown schedules.</jats:p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • strength
  • steel
  • Hydrogen
  • ductility