People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Benzerzour, Mahfoud
IMT Nord Europe
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (21/21 displayed)
- 2024A novel approach based on microstructural modeling and a multi-scale model to predicting the mechanical-elastic properties of cement pastecitations
- 2024Advancements in Heavy Metal Stabilization
- 2023Managing the Heat Release of Calcium Sulfoaluminate Cement by Modifying the Ye’elimite Contentcitations
- 2023Development of Flash-Calcined Sediment and Blast Furnace Slag Ternary Binderscitations
- 2022The Use of Callovo-Oxfordian Argillite as a Raw Material for Portland Cement Clinker Productioncitations
- 2022Flash calcined sediment used in the CEM III cement production and the potential production of hydraulic binder for the road construction – Part I: Characterization of CEM III cements
- 2022Prediction of the Compressive Strength of Waste-Based Concretes Using Artificial Neural Networkcitations
- 2022Recycling of Flash-Calcined Dredged Sediment for Concrete 3D Printingcitations
- 2022Effect of flash-calcined sediment substitution in sulfoaluminate cement mortarcitations
- 2022Compressed Earth Blocks Using Sediments and Alkali-Activated Byproductscitations
- 2022The Pozzolanic Activity of Sediments Treated by the Flash Calcination Methodcitations
- 2022High performance mortar using flash calcined materials
- 2022Reuse of treated wastewater and non-potable groundwater in the manufacture of concrete: major challenge of environmental preservationcitations
- 2022Designing Efficient Flash-Calcined Sediment-Based Ecobinderscitations
- 2021Evaluation of the Mechanical and Environmental Properties of Self-Compacting Mortars with Raw Harbour Dredging Sediments (SCMs)
- 2021Manufacturing of Low-Carbon Binders Using Waste Glass and Dredged Sediments: Formulation and Performance Assessment at Laboratory Scalecitations
- 2021From dredged sediment to supplementary cementitious material: characterization, treatment, and reusecitations
- 2021Influence of fine sediments on rheology properties of self-compacting concretescitations
- 2018Durability of a cementitious matrix based on treated sedimentscitations
- 2018Use of uncontaminated marine sediments in mortar and concrete by partial substitution of cementcitations
- 2012Experimental Results of Polyester/Glass Fibers – Cementitious Matrix Bond Characteristics: Effect of Silane on Fiberscitations
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
Development of Flash-Calcined Sediment and Blast Furnace Slag Ternary Binders
Abstract
<jats:p>Partial cement replacement by low-carbon-impact additions has the potential to reduce CO2 emissions. The aim of this study is the development of a ternary binder that includes ordinary Portland cement (OPC), ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS), and flash-calcined sediment (FCS). To upgrade dredged mineral material into FCS, a new heat treatment, i.e., flash calcination, was used. The used materials were physically, chemically, and mineralogically characterized. The mixture design method was used to optimize the design of the ternary blended binders. A model was developed and validated for the prediction of the 90-day compressive strength for mortars composed of OPC (C), GGBS (S), and FCS (F). Five mixes, reference RM (100% OPC), binary mix (50% OPC and 50% GGBS), and three ternary mixes with FCS rates of 10%, 15%, and 20% were characterized in fresh and hardened states. The results show that the incorporation of FCS reduced the workability of the mixes and increased their densities. Moreover, the initial setting time of the mix was delayed, and the heat of the hydration peak was decreased. The 90-day compressive strengths of the mix containing 10% FCS were higher than those of RM. In conclusion, the use of 10% FCS and 40% GGBS was an efficient substitute for 50% OPC.</jats:p>