People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Benzerzour, Mahfoud
IMT Nord Europe
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (21/21 displayed)
- 2024A novel approach based on microstructural modeling and a multi-scale model to predicting the mechanical-elastic properties of cement pastecitations
- 2024Advancements in Heavy Metal Stabilization
- 2023Managing the Heat Release of Calcium Sulfoaluminate Cement by Modifying the Ye’elimite Contentcitations
- 2023Development of Flash-Calcined Sediment and Blast Furnace Slag Ternary Binderscitations
- 2022The Use of Callovo-Oxfordian Argillite as a Raw Material for Portland Cement Clinker Productioncitations
- 2022Flash calcined sediment used in the CEM III cement production and the potential production of hydraulic binder for the road construction – Part I: Characterization of CEM III cements
- 2022Prediction of the Compressive Strength of Waste-Based Concretes Using Artificial Neural Networkcitations
- 2022Recycling of Flash-Calcined Dredged Sediment for Concrete 3D Printingcitations
- 2022Effect of flash-calcined sediment substitution in sulfoaluminate cement mortarcitations
- 2022Compressed Earth Blocks Using Sediments and Alkali-Activated Byproductscitations
- 2022The Pozzolanic Activity of Sediments Treated by the Flash Calcination Methodcitations
- 2022High performance mortar using flash calcined materials
- 2022Reuse of treated wastewater and non-potable groundwater in the manufacture of concrete: major challenge of environmental preservationcitations
- 2022Designing Efficient Flash-Calcined Sediment-Based Ecobinderscitations
- 2021Evaluation of the Mechanical and Environmental Properties of Self-Compacting Mortars with Raw Harbour Dredging Sediments (SCMs)
- 2021Manufacturing of Low-Carbon Binders Using Waste Glass and Dredged Sediments: Formulation and Performance Assessment at Laboratory Scalecitations
- 2021From dredged sediment to supplementary cementitious material: characterization, treatment, and reusecitations
- 2021Influence of fine sediments on rheology properties of self-compacting concretescitations
- 2018Durability of a cementitious matrix based on treated sedimentscitations
- 2018Use of uncontaminated marine sediments in mortar and concrete by partial substitution of cementcitations
- 2012Experimental Results of Polyester/Glass Fibers – Cementitious Matrix Bond Characteristics: Effect of Silane on Fiberscitations
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
The Use of Callovo-Oxfordian Argillite as a Raw Material for Portland Cement Clinker Production
Abstract
<jats:p>Excavated soils and rocks are materials obtained in construction works that could represent an ecological issue if a durable and efficient reuse process is not set. The radioactive waste disposal planned by the French National Radioactive Waste Management Agency will generate large quantities of excavated soil (mainly as Callovo-Oxfordian argillite). The re-use of excavated soils is a recent question. There is a lack in the literature concerning the recycling of such materials. Therefore, this paper aims to investigate the possibility of using Callovo-Oxfordian argillite (COx argillite from the French URL) as a raw material for Portland cement clinker production. COx argillite was first characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and X-ray fluorescence (XRF) then a Portland cement clinker was synthesized at laboratory scale. The produced clinker was characterized to verify the chemical and mineralogical composition. After adding gypsum, the reactivity of the resulting cement was assessed by setting time and isothermal calorimetry measurements. The compressive strength was assessed on standard mortar prisms at 1, 14 and 28 days. The results show that a Portland cement clinker containing 64% C3S, 14% C2S, 10% C4AF, 7% C3A and 1% CaO can be produced when 22.24% of raw meal was substituted by the COx argillite. The setting time and isothermal calorimetry results show that the produced cement shows an equivalent reactivity to conventional ordinary Portland cement. The compressive strength at 28 days is 56 MPa, showing that the produced cement can be considered as CEM I 52.5 N Portland cement.</jats:p>