People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Marto, Cm
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (12/12 displayed)
- 2023Three-Dimensional Impression of Biomaterials for Alveolar Graft: Scoping Reviewcitations
- 2022Effect of Different Cavity Disinfectants on Adhesion to Dentin of Permanent Teethcitations
- 2022Evaluation of the Sealing Ability and Bond Strength of Two Endodontic Root Canal Sealers: An In Vitro Studycitations
- 2022What Is the Most Effective Technique for Bonding Brackets on Ceramic-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysiscitations
- 2022The Biological Effects of 3D Resins Used in Orthodontics: A Systematic Reviewcitations
- 2021Effect of Cavity Disinfectants on Adhesion to Primary Teeth-A Systematic Reviewcitations
- 2021Mechanical Characterization of Two Dental Restorative Materials after Acidic Challengecitations
- 2021The Influence of Irrigation during the Finishing and Polishing of Composite Resin Restorations-A Systematic Review of In Vitro Studiescitations
- 2021Mechanical and Tribological Characterization of a Bioactive Composite Resincitations
- 2021Aesthetic restoration of posterior teeth using different occlusal matrix techniquescitations
- 2020Mechanical and Tribological Characterization of a Dental Ceromercitations
- 2015Effects on gastric mucosa induced by dental bleaching - an experimental study with 6% hydrogen peroxide in ratscitations
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
document
What Is the Most Effective Technique for Bonding Brackets on Ceramic-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Abstract
Background: There has been an increase in demand for orthodontic treatment within the adult population, who likely receive restorative treatments using ceramic structures. The current state of the art regarding the most effective method to achieve an appropriate bond strength of brackets on ceramic surfaces isn't consensual. This systematic review aims to compare the available surface treatments to ceramics and determine the one that allows to obtain the best bond strength. Methods: This systematic review followed the PRISMA guidelines and the PICO methodology was used, with the question "What is the most effective technique for bonding brackets on ceramic crowns or veneers?". The research was carried out in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane Library databases. In vitro and ex vivo studies were included. The methodological quality was evaluated using the guidelines for reporting of preclinical studies on dental materials by Faggion Jr. Results: A total of 655 articles searched in various databases were initially scrutinized. Sevety one articles were chosen for quality analysis. The risk of bias was considered medium to high in most studies. The use of hydrofluoric acid (HF), silane and laser afforded the overall best results. HF and HF plus laser achieved significantly highest bond strength scores in felsdphatic porcelain, while laser was the best treatment in lithium disilicate ceramics. Conclusions: The most effective technique for bonding brackets on ceramic is dependent on the type of ceramic.