| People | Locations | Statistics |
|---|---|---|
| Naji, M. |
| |
| Motta, Antonella |
| |
| Aletan, Dirar |
| |
| Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
| Ertürk, Emre |
| |
| Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
| Kononenko, Denys |
| |
| Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
| Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
| Bih, L. |
| |
| Casati, R. |
| |
| Muller, Hermance |
| |
| Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
| Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
| Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
| Azam, Siraj |
| |
| Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
| Blanpain, Bart |
| |
| Ali, M. A. |
| |
| Popa, V. |
| |
| Rančić, M. |
| |
| Ollier, Nadège |
| |
| Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
| Landes, Michael |
| |
| Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Tyrer, Mark
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (10/10 displayed)
- 2024Influence of Calcining Temperature on the Mineralogical and Mechanical Performance of Calcined Impure Kaolinitic Clays in Portland Cement Mortarscitations
- 2022Comparing the Measured and Thermodynamically Predicted AFm Phases in a Hydrating Cementcitations
- 2022Potential of calcined brick clay as a partial substitution in blended cement mortarscitations
- 2022Mechanochemical Characterisation of Calcined Impure Kaolinitic Clay as a Composite Binder in Cementitious Mortarscitations
- 2022Performance of low-grade kaolinitic clay as a cement substitute in mortar: A comparative study with fly ash
- 2022Use of low grade kaolinitic clays in development of a pozzolan-cement binder system
- 2020Effect of Power Ultrasound on the Portland cement paste and mortar: study of chemical shrinkage and compressive and flexural strength development
- 2019Influence of power ultrasound on the portland cement pore solution compositions
- 2019Effects of Sodium Silicate Proportion on Strength Development of Calcined Clay Geopolymer Mortar
- 2018Application of power ultrasound to cementitious materials: Advances, issues and perspectivescitations
Places of action
| Organizations | Location | People |
|---|
article
Comparing the Measured and Thermodynamically Predicted AFm Phases in a Hydrating Cement
Abstract
<jats:p>In hydrating Portland cements, more than one of the AFm family of calcium aluminates may exist. Depending on the amount of carbonate and sulfate present in the cement, the most common phase to precipitate is monosulfate, monocarbonate and/or hemicarbonate. It has been reported in the literature that hemicarbonate often appears in measurements such as XRD but not predicted to form/equilibrate in thermodynamic models. With the ongoing use of commercial cements such as CEM I and CEM II containing more and more limestone, it is important to understand which hydrate solids physically precipitate and numerically predict over time. Using 27 cement samples with three w/c ratios analysed at 1, 3 and 28 days, this paper shows that although hemicarbonate was observed in a hydrating commercial Portland cement, as well as being predicted based on its carbonate (CO2/Al2O3) and sulfate (SO3/Al2O3) ratios, thermodynamic analysis did not predict it to equilibrate and form as a solid hydrate. Regardless of the w/c ratio, thermodynamic analysis did predict hemicarbonate to form for calcite contents < 2 wt.%. It appears that the dominant stability of monocarbonate in thermodynamic models leads to it precipitating and remaining as a persistent phase.</jats:p>