Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Mathew, Jino

  • Google
  • 2
  • 6
  • 27

Coventry University

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2021Machine learning-based prediction and optimisation system for laser shock peening27citations
  • 2015Weld Residual Stress Profiles for Structural Integrity Assessmentcitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Fitzpatrick, Michael
1 / 26 shared
Kshirsagar, Rohit
1 / 3 shared
Smyth, Niall
1 / 7 shared
Zabeen, Suraiya
1 / 3 shared
Langer, Kristina
1 / 1 shared
Kanarachos, Stratis
1 / 4 shared
Chart of publication period
2021
2015

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Fitzpatrick, Michael
  • Kshirsagar, Rohit
  • Smyth, Niall
  • Zabeen, Suraiya
  • Langer, Kristina
  • Kanarachos, Stratis
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Machine learning-based prediction and optimisation system for laser shock peening

  • Mathew, Jino
  • Fitzpatrick, Michael
  • Kshirsagar, Rohit
  • Smyth, Niall
  • Zabeen, Suraiya
  • Langer, Kristina
  • Kanarachos, Stratis
Abstract

Laser shock peening (LSP) as a surface treatment technique can improve the fatigue life and corrosion resistance of metallic materials by introducing significant compressive residual stresses near the surface. However, LSP-induced residual stresses are known to be dependent on a multitude of factors, such as laser process variables (spot size, pulse width and energy), component<br/>geometry, material properties and the peening sequence. In this study, an intelligent system based on machine learning was developed that can predict the residual stress distribution induced by LSP. The system can also be applied to “reverse-optimise” the process parameters. The prediction system was<br/>developed using residual stress data derived from incremental hole drilling. We used artificial neural networks (ANNs) within a Bayesian framework to develop a robust prediction model validated using a comprehensive set of case studies. We also studied the relative importance of the LSP process parameters using Garson’s algorithm and parametric studies to understand the response of the residual stresses in laser peening systems as a function of different process variables. Furthermore, this study critically evaluates the developed machine learning models while demonstrating the potential benefits of implementing an intelligent system in prediction and optimisation strategies of the laser shock peening process.

Topics
  • surface
  • corrosion
  • fatigue
  • machine learning