People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Fawzy, Amr
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (23/23 displayed)
- 2024Effect of inositol hexaphosphate acid versus polyacrylic acid on dentin properties and adhesion of a self-adhesive restorative material to dentincitations
- 2024The Synergistic Effect of High Intensity Focused Ultrasound on In-vitro Remineralization of Tooth Enamel by Calcium Phosphate Ion Clusterscitations
- 2024Flowable resin-based composites modified with chlorhexidine-loaded mesoporous silica nanoparticles induce superior antibiofilm properties
- 2022Cytotoxicity and antimicrobial efficiency of ZrO2 nanoparticles reinforced 3D printed resinscitations
- 2022Development of 3D printed dental resin nanocomposite with graphene nanoplatelets enhanced mechanical properties and induced drug-free antimicrobial activity.citations
- 2021Development of 3D printed resin reinforced with modified ZrO2 nanoparticles for long-term provisional dental restorationscitations
- 2021Formulation of pH-sensitive chlorhexidine-loaded/mesoporous silica nanoparticles modified experimental dentin adhesivecitations
- 2020The Effect of Cross-linking Efficiency of Drug-Loaded Novel Freeze Gelated Chitosan Templates for Periodontal Tissue Regenerationcitations
- 2020Effect of acid etching on dentin bond strength of ultra-mild self-etch adhesivescitations
- 2020Properties of a modified quaternary ammonium silane formulation as a potential root canal irrigant in endodonticscitations
- 2020In vitro bonding performance of modern self-adhesive resin cements and conventional resin-modified glass ionomer cements to prosthetic substratescitations
- 2019Resin-based dental composites for tooth filling
- 2019Macrophage response and surface analysis of dental cementum after treatment with high intensity focused ultrasoundcitations
- 2019An in vitro study of a novel quaternary ammonium silane endodontic irrigantcitations
- 2019Co-blend application mode of bulk fill composite resincitations
- 2018In vitro assessment of ribose modified two-step etch-and-rinse dentine adhesivecitations
- 2017Proanthocyanidins-Loaded Nanoparticles Enhance Dentin Degradation Resistancecitations
- 2017Potentiating the antibacterial effect of silver nanospheres by surface-capping with chlorhexidine gluconatecitations
- 2015Characterization of antibacterial and adhesion properties of chitosan-modified glass ionomer cementcitations
- 2012Riboflavin as a dentin crosslinking agentcitations
- 2009Effect acidic and alkaline/heat treatments on the bond strength of different luting cements to commercially pure titaniumcitations
- 2009Tensile bond strength of immediately repaired anterior microfine hybrid restorative composite using nontrimmed hourglass specimens
- 2008Effect of surface treatments on the tensile bond strength of repaired water-aged anterior restorative micro-fine hybrid resin compositecitations
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
In vitro bonding performance of modern self-adhesive resin cements and conventional resin-modified glass ionomer cements to prosthetic substrates
Abstract
<p>This study aimed at evaluating the shear bond strength (SBS) of modern self-adhesive resin cements and resin-modified glass ionomer cements applied to different prosthetic substrates. Zirconia, lithium-disilicate glass-ceramic and a noble metal alloy were used as bonding substrates. They were all sand-blasted with alumina, while LD was further etched with 9.6% hydrofluoric acid (10 s). A light-curing resin-modified glass ionomer cement (3M-GIC: Ketac Cem Plus) and a self-curing resin-modified glass ionomer cement (GC-GIC: FujiCEM 2) were compared to self-adhesive resin cements (PAN: Panavia SA Universal) and (3M-RES: Rely X Unicem 2). Ten specimens for each substrate were produced and up to five cylinders of each cement were bonded to each substrate. The shear bond strength (SBS) was evaluated after 24 h or after thermocycling (TC) aging (5000 cycles). The data was statistically analysed by two-way ANOVA and Student–Newman–Keuls test (α = 0.05). Failure modes were analysed through stereoscopic microscopy. The greatest SBS was attained with PAN, whilst 3M-GIC showed the lowest SBS and failed prevalently in adhesive mode. No difference in SBS was observed between GC-GIC and 3M-RES. After TC aging, all cements showed significant drop (p < 0.05) in SBS, but PAN showed the greatest SBS. Reliable bond strength to prosthetic substrates can be achieved with specific universal resin-luting cements and may be an alternative to glass ionomer cements when luting alloy substrates.</p>