Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Shinkins, Bethany

  • Google
  • 3
  • 28
  • 25

University of Warwick

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (3/3 displayed)

  • 2022An exploratory assessment of the impact of a novel risk assessment test on breast cancer clinic waiting times and workflow: a discrete event simulation model1citations
  • 2022P14 Procalcitonin evaluation of antibiotic use in COVID-19 hospitalized patients during the first wave of COVID-19: the PEACH studycitations
  • 2021Use of Procalcitonin during the First Wave of COVID-19 in the Acute NHS Hospitals: A Retrospective Observational Study24citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Sharma, Nisha
1 / 4 shared
Neal, Richard D.
1 / 1 shared
Hick, Louise
1 / 1 shared
Frempong, Samuel N.
1 / 1 shared
Smith, Alison F.
1 / 1 shared
Howard, Philip
2 / 2 shared
Thomas-Jones, Emma
2 / 3 shared
Llewelyn, Martin J.
2 / 2 shared
West, Robert
1 / 3 shared
Todd, Stacy
2 / 2 shared
Powell, Neil
2 / 2 shared
Albur, Mahableswhar
2 / 2 shared
Shaw, Dominick E.
2 / 2 shared
Partridge, David G.
2 / 2 shared
Szakmany, Tamas
2 / 2 shared
Parsons, Helena
2 / 2 shared
Euden, Joanne
2 / 3 shared
Pallmann, Philip
2 / 2 shared
Ogden, Margaret
2 / 2 shared
Sandoe, Jonathan A. T.
2 / 2 shared
Mccullagh, Iain J.
2 / 2 shared
Carrol, Enitan D.
2 / 2 shared
Hopkins, Susan
2 / 4 shared
Dark, Paul
2 / 2 shared
Bond, Stuart E.
2 / 2 shared
Hellyer, Thomas P.
2 / 2 shared
Brookes-Howell, Lucy
2 / 4 shared
West, Robert
1 / 2 shared
Chart of publication period
2022
2021

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Sharma, Nisha
  • Neal, Richard D.
  • Hick, Louise
  • Frempong, Samuel N.
  • Smith, Alison F.
  • Howard, Philip
  • Thomas-Jones, Emma
  • Llewelyn, Martin J.
  • West, Robert
  • Todd, Stacy
  • Powell, Neil
  • Albur, Mahableswhar
  • Shaw, Dominick E.
  • Partridge, David G.
  • Szakmany, Tamas
  • Parsons, Helena
  • Euden, Joanne
  • Pallmann, Philip
  • Ogden, Margaret
  • Sandoe, Jonathan A. T.
  • Mccullagh, Iain J.
  • Carrol, Enitan D.
  • Hopkins, Susan
  • Dark, Paul
  • Bond, Stuart E.
  • Hellyer, Thomas P.
  • Brookes-Howell, Lucy
  • West, Robert
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Use of Procalcitonin during the First Wave of COVID-19 in the Acute NHS Hospitals: A Retrospective Observational Study

  • Howard, Philip
  • Thomas-Jones, Emma
  • Llewelyn, Martin J.
  • Todd, Stacy
  • Powell, Neil
  • Albur, Mahableswhar
  • Shaw, Dominick E.
  • Partridge, David G.
  • Szakmany, Tamas
  • Parsons, Helena
  • Euden, Joanne
  • Pallmann, Philip
  • Ogden, Margaret
  • Sandoe, Jonathan A. T.
  • Mccullagh, Iain J.
  • Carrol, Enitan D.
  • Hopkins, Susan
  • Shinkins, Bethany
  • West, Robert
  • Dark, Paul
  • Bond, Stuart E.
  • Hellyer, Thomas P.
  • Brookes-Howell, Lucy
Abstract

A minority of patients presenting to hospital with COVID-19 have bacterial co-infection. Procalcitonin testing may help identify patients for whom antibiotics should be prescribed or withheld. This study describes the use of procalcitonin in English and Welsh hospitals during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. A web-based survey of antimicrobial leads gathered data about the use of procalcitonin testing. Responses were received from 148/151 (98%) eligible hospitals. During the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, there was widespread introduction and expansion of PCT use in NHS hospitals. The number of hospitals using PCT in emergency/acute admissions rose from 17 (11%) to 74/146 (50.7%) and use in Intensive Care Units (ICU) increased from 70 (47.6%) to 124/147 (84.4%). This increase happened predominantly in March and April 2020, preceding NICE guidance. Approximately half of hospitals used PCT as a single test to guide decisions to discontinue antibiotics and half used repeated measurements. There was marked variation in the thresholds used for empiric antibiotic cessation and guidance about interpretation of values. Procalcitonin testing has been widely adopted in the NHS during the COVID-19 pandemic in an unevidenced, heterogeneous way and in conflict with relevant NICE guidance. Further research is needed urgently that assesses the impact of this change on antibiotic prescribing and patient safety.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy