People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Breuker, Roeland De
Delft University of Technology
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (22/22 displayed)
- 2024Aeroelastic Tailoring of a Strut-Braced Wing for a Medium Range Aircraftcitations
- 2023Optimization Framework of a Ram Air Inlet Composite Morphing Flapcitations
- 2022Application of Aeroelastic Tailoring for Load Alleviation on a Flying Demonstrator Wing †citations
- 2022Assessment of an Increased-Fidelity Aeroelastic Experiment for Free Flying Wing Response to Gust Excitation
- 2022Aeroelastic Wing Demonstrator with a Distributed and Decentralized Control Architecturecitations
- 2022An aeroelastic optimisation framework for manufacturable variable stiffness composite wings including critical gust loadscitations
- 2021Development and testing of an active trailing edge morphing demonstrator for a rotary wingcitations
- 2021Skin Panel Optimization of the Common Research Model Wing using Sandwich Compositescitations
- 2021Aeroelastic optimisation of manufacturable tow-steered composite wings with cruise shape constraint and gust loadscitations
- 2021Developing the Model Reduction Framework in High Frame Rate Visual Tracking Environment
- 2020Static and dynamic aeroelastic tailoring with composite blending and manoeuvre load alleviationcitations
- 2020Ground Testing of the FLEXOP Demonstrator Aircraftcitations
- 2019Aeroelastic optimization of composite wings including fatigue loading requirementscitations
- 2018FLEXOP – Application of aeroelastic tailoring to a flying demonstrator wing
- 2018Aeroelastic optimization of composite wings subjected to fatigue loadscitations
- 2017Aeroelastic Design of Blended Composite Structures Using Lamination Parameterscitations
- 2017Aeroelastic tailoring for static and dynamic loads with blending constraints
- 2016Aeroelastic Optimization of Variable Stiffness Composite Wing with Blending Constraintscitations
- 2016A Conceptual Development of a Shape Memory Alloy Actuated Variable Camber Morphing Wing
- 2016Derivation and application of blending constraints in lamination parameter space for composite optimisationcitations
- 2015Special Issue
- 2015Development and Testing of an Unconventional Morphing Wing Concept with Variable Chord and Camber
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
Application of Aeroelastic Tailoring for Load Alleviation on a Flying Demonstrator Wing †
Abstract
<p>This article presents the application of aeroelastic tailoring in the design of wings for a flying demonstrator, as well as the validation of the design methodology with flight test results. The investigations were performed in the FLEXOP project (Flutter Free Flight Envelope Expansion for Economical Performance Improvement), funded under the Horizon 2020 framework. This project aimed at the validation of methods and tools for active flutter control, as well as at the demonstration of the potential of passive load alleviation through composite tailoring. The technologies were to be demonstrated by the design, manufacturing and flight testing of an unmanned aerial vehicle of approximately 7 m wingspan. This article addresses the work towards the load alleviation goals. The design of the primary load-carrying wing-box in this task is performed using a joint DLR–TU Delft optimization strategy. Two sets of wings are designed in order to demonstrate the potential benefits of aeroelastic tailoring—first, a reference wing in which the laminates of the wing-box members are restricted to balanced and symmetric laminates; second, a tailored wing in which the laminates are allowed to be unbalanced, hence allowing for the shear–extension and bending–torsion couplings essential for aeroelastic tailoring. Both designs are numerically optimized, then manufactured and extensively tested to validate and improve the simulation models corresponding to the wing designs. Flight tests are performed, the results of which form the basis for the validation of the applied aeroelastic tailoring approach presented in the article.</p>