Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Gauvin, Raynald

  • Google
  • 6
  • 33
  • 161

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (6/6 displayed)

  • 2022Experimental methods in chemical engineering: Scanning electron microscopy and X-ray ultra-microscopy—SEM and XuM24citations
  • 2022Training Deep Neural Networks to Reconstruct Nanoporous Structures From FIB Tomography Images Using Synthetic Training Data15citations
  • 2021Enhancing Singlet Oxygen Photocatalysis with Plasmonic Nanoparticles24citations
  • 2021Scanning Electron Microscopy versus Transmission Electron Microscopy for Material Characterization: A Comparative Study on High-Strength Steels29citations
  • 2020Direct observation of lithium metal dendrites with ceramic solid electrolyte67citations
  • 2017Thermal Stability of Cryomilled Al-Mg-Er Powders2citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Davies, Thomas E.
1 / 10 shared
Bessette, Stéphanie
1 / 1 shared
Patience, Gregory S.
1 / 1 shared
Dummer, Nicholas F.
1 / 4 shared
Li, He
1 / 4 shared
Cyron, Christian J.
1 / 6 shared
Aydin, Roland C.
1 / 1 shared
Piché, Nicolas
2 / 2 shared
Ritter, Martin
1 / 15 shared
Li, Yong
1 / 6 shared
Sardhara, Trushal
1 / 1 shared
Amara, Zacharias
1 / 1 shared
Gellé, Alexandra
1 / 1 shared
Price, Gareth
1 / 2 shared
Brodusch, Nicolas
2 / 3 shared
Voisard, Frédéric
1 / 1 shared
Moores, Audrey
1 / 2 shared
Brahimi, Salim V.
1 / 1 shared
Song, Jun
1 / 4 shared
Melo, Evelin Barbosa De
1 / 1 shared
Yue, Stephen
1 / 2 shared
Zaghib, Karim
1 / 10 shared
Delaporte, Nicolas
1 / 3 shared
Paolella, Andrea
1 / 8 shared
Guerfi, Abdelbast
1 / 8 shared
Demers, Hendrix
1 / 3 shared
Girard, Gabriel
1 / 5 shared
Lorrmann, Henning
1 / 5 shared
Savoie, Sylvio
1 / 4 shared
Golozar, Maryam
1 / 1 shared
Brochu, Mathieu
1 / 1 shared
Blais, Carl
1 / 3 shared
Akinrinlola, Bamidele
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2022
2021
2020
2017

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Davies, Thomas E.
  • Bessette, Stéphanie
  • Patience, Gregory S.
  • Dummer, Nicholas F.
  • Li, He
  • Cyron, Christian J.
  • Aydin, Roland C.
  • Piché, Nicolas
  • Ritter, Martin
  • Li, Yong
  • Sardhara, Trushal
  • Amara, Zacharias
  • Gellé, Alexandra
  • Price, Gareth
  • Brodusch, Nicolas
  • Voisard, Frédéric
  • Moores, Audrey
  • Brahimi, Salim V.
  • Song, Jun
  • Melo, Evelin Barbosa De
  • Yue, Stephen
  • Zaghib, Karim
  • Delaporte, Nicolas
  • Paolella, Andrea
  • Guerfi, Abdelbast
  • Demers, Hendrix
  • Girard, Gabriel
  • Lorrmann, Henning
  • Savoie, Sylvio
  • Golozar, Maryam
  • Brochu, Mathieu
  • Blais, Carl
  • Akinrinlola, Bamidele
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Training Deep Neural Networks to Reconstruct Nanoporous Structures From FIB Tomography Images Using Synthetic Training Data

  • Cyron, Christian J.
  • Aydin, Roland C.
  • Piché, Nicolas
  • Ritter, Martin
  • Gauvin, Raynald
  • Li, Yong
  • Sardhara, Trushal
Abstract

<jats:p>Focused ion beam (FIB) tomography is a destructive technique used to collect three-dimensional (3D) structural information at a resolution of a few nanometers. For FIB tomography, a material sample is degraded by layer-wise milling. After each layer, the current surface is imaged by a scanning electron microscope (SEM), providing a consecutive series of cross-sections of the three-dimensional material sample. Especially for nanoporous materials, the reconstruction of the 3D microstructure of the material, from the information collected during FIB tomography, is impaired by the so-called <jats:italic>shine-through effect</jats:italic>. This effect prevents a unique mapping between voxel intensity values and material phase (e.g., solid or void). It often substantially reduces the accuracy of conventional methods for image segmentation. Here we demonstrate how machine learning can be used to tackle this problem. A bottleneck in doing so is the availability of sufficient training data. To overcome this problem, we present a novel approach to generate synthetic training data in the form of FIB-SEM images generated by Monte Carlo simulations. Based on this approach, we compare the performance of different machine learning architectures for segmenting FIB tomography data of nanoporous materials. We demonstrate that two-dimensional (2D) convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures processing a group of adjacent slices as input data as well as 3D CNN perform best and can enhance the segmentation performance significantly.</jats:p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • microstructure
  • surface
  • phase
  • scanning electron microscopy
  • simulation
  • grinding
  • tomography
  • milling
  • focused ion beam
  • two-dimensional
  • void
  • machine learning