People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Wagreich, Michael
University of Vienna
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (1/1 displayed)
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
TETGAR_C: a novel three-dimensional (3D) provenance plot and calculation tool for detrital garnets
Abstract
This paper presents a new interactive MATLAB-based visualization and calculation tool (TETGAR_C) for assessing the<br/>provenance of detrital garnets in a four-component (tetrahedral) plot system (almandine–pyrope–grossular–spessartine).<br/>Based on a freely-accessible database and additional electron-microprobe data, the chemistry of more than 2,600 garnet<br/>samples was evaluated and used to create various subfields in the tetrahedron that correspond to calc-silicate rocks, felsic<br/>igneous rocks (granites and pegmatites) as well as metasedimentary and metaigneous rocks of various metamorphic<br/>grades. These subfields act as reference structures facilitating assignments of garnet chemistries to source lithologies.<br/>An integrated function calculates whether a point is located in a subfield or not. Moreover, TETGAR_C determines<br/>the distance to the closest subfield’s mean value. Compared with conventional ternary garnet discrimination diagrams,<br/>this provenance tool enables a more accurate assessment of potential source rocks by reducing the overlap of specific<br/>subfields and offering quantitative testing of garnet compositions. In particular, a much clearer distinction between<br/>garnets from greenschist-facies rocks, amphibolite-facies rocks, blueschist-facies rocks and felsic igneous rocks is<br/>achieved. Moreover, TETGAR_C enables a distinction between garnet grains with metaigneous and metasedimentary<br/>provenance. In general, metaigneous garnet tends to have higher grossular content than metasedimentary garnet formed<br/>under similar P–T conditions.